Website review, no card needed
nord.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202633 issues · 86 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on nord.com, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 119 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.4 s · 2.3 MB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.8 s · 750 KiB10 images could be 750 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.3 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 3.3 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 234 KiBAbout 234 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
330 ms · 516 KiBAbout 516 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 330 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Cookiebot and Hubspot and others), adding 457 KiB and 290 ms of main-thread time.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 177 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.6 s
11.6 sYour largest element takes 11.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 20.5 s
20.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 927 ms
927 msReal visitors wait 927 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 276 ms
276 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 276 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 86 ms
86 msReal visitors wait 86 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.012
0.012The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.012, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 91 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 91 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (31), images 1.2 MB (25) and fonts 333 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images in older formats
4 images (739 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
369 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mynord_homeslider_highresolution1920x1152.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 369 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (182 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.91 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 108.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
206 internal links, 39 external
The homepage links to 206 pages on nord.com and 39 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 149 characters
Your meta description is 149 characters: “NORD Drivesystems is one of the world's leading manufacturers of drive technology for mechanical and electronic solutio…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “NORD DRIVESYSTEMS Group - Innovative Drive Solutions”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “NORD: Speed Reducers, Gear Motors, AC Vector Drives | NORD”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.nord.com/us/home-us.jsp.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nord.com/en/global/google-sitemap-index-page.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.nord.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,248 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.nord.com/oauth2/authorization/keycloak is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
5 pages share 2 titles
https://www.nord.com/us/home-us.jsp and https://www.nord.com/us/index-homepage.jsp all use the title “NORD: Speed Reducers, Gear Motors, AC Vector Drives | NORD”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.nord.com/oauth2/authorization/keycloak, https://www.nord.com/us/products/usp/mynord-dashboard/portal-dashboard.jsp, https://www.nord.com/us/products/usp/product-search/product-search.jsp and https://www.nord.com/us/products/usp/drawings/configurator.jsp have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.nord.com/us/index-homepage.jsp, whose canonical is https://www.nord.com/us/home-us.jsp. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.nord.com/us/products/usp/mynord-dashboard/portal-dashboard.jsp, https://www.nord.com/us/products/usp/product-search/product-search.jsp and https://www.nord.com/us/products/usp/drawings/configurator.jsp have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 151 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://e1-0850197d5e074be58352ddc860645af6.ecs.us-east-1.on.aws/events?cee=no' violates the following C…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 819 words of copy
The homepage carries about 819 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More About LogiDrive®” and “Learn More About NORDAC® PRO”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Service Contact” and “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nord.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 514
- Founded
- 1965
- Headquarters
- Bargteheide
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on nord.com, including 14 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.