Website review, no card needed

nps.gov logo

nps.gov website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202640 issues · 81 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on nps.gov, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s1.0 sApr 18Oct 31.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.0 s
Apr 25, 20261.1 s
May 2, 20261.1 s
May 9, 20261.1 s
May 16, 20261.1 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
86 ms78 msApr 18Oct 385 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202679 ms
Apr 25, 202679 ms
May 2, 202679 ms
May 9, 202679 ms
May 16, 202679 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jun 13, 202680 ms
Jun 20, 202680 ms
Jun 27, 202680 ms
Jul 4, 202680 ms
Jul 11, 202680 ms
Jul 18, 202680 ms
Jul 25, 202680 ms
Aug 1, 202680 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202680 ms
Aug 29, 202680 ms
Sep 5, 202680 ms
Sep 12, 202680 ms
Sep 19, 202680 ms
Sep 26, 202681 ms
Oct 3, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of nps.gov (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. nps.gov at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. nps.gov at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. nps.gov at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. nps.gov at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. nps.gov at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. nps.gov at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. nps.gov at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. nps.gov at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix43
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    11.3 s · 3.2 MB

    56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.2 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.2 s · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    5.1 s · 1,004 KiB

    About 1,004 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.4 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.4 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 1.0 MB

    10 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    1.5 s · 256 KiB

    256 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (doi.gov, Google Tag Manager and digitalgov.gov and others), adding 13.0 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • doi.gov adds 871 ms

    871 ms

    doi.gov costs a phone 871 ms of main-thread work and 12.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 571 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.1 s

    26.1 s

    Your largest element takes 26.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.5 s

    27.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 494 ms

    494 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 494 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 409 ms

    409 ms

    Real visitors wait 409 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 16.4 MB in 92 requests

    16.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.4 MB in 92 requests on a phone: other files 11.5 MB (12), scripts 2.4 MB (38) and images 1.4 MB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    SocialMediaFeature.png weighs 602 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    410 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example SocialMediaFeature.png at 1,966 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 410 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (602 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (602 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.65 g of CO₂e: 557.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 10094
  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (3 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10082
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 248 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 248 pages on nps.gov and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 120 characters

    Your meta description is 120 characters: “The National Park Service cares for special places saved by the American people so that all may experience our heritage.”.

  • Title: 45 characters

    Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “NPS.gov Homepage (U.S. National Park Service)”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nps.gov/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.nps.gov/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (795 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.nps.gov/index.htm and / all use the title “NPS.gov Homepage (U.S. National Park Service)”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    / and https://www.nps.gov/findapark/index.htm have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 200 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“`SharedArrayBuffer` will require cross-origin isolation. See https://developer.chrome.com/blog/enab…”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'querySelector')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 317 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 317 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Subscribe” and “Contact The National Park Service”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nps.gov, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Company

Employees
20,000
Founded
1916
Headquarters
Washington, D.C.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on nps.gov, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25