Website review, no card needed
nu3.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202633 issues · 79 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on nu3.fr, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #43,588 of 96,085 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #27,566 of 51,973 online storesbeats 41%
- #26,353 of 47,069 Shopify storesbeats 38%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 155 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
3.0 s
3.4 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.6 s · 3.6 MB14 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.5 s · 2.8 MB25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.8 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
950 ms · 348 KiBAbout 348 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (sa-tech.de, Usercentrics CMP and adtriba.com and others), adding 1.2 MB and 651 ms of main-thread time.
sa-tech.de adds 543 ms
543 mssa-tech.de costs a phone 543 ms of main-thread work and 969 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,276 HTML elements
The page has 2,276 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
190 ms · 20 KiBAbout 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 142 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 219 ms
219 msYour server sent the HTML in 219 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.7 s
15.7 sYour largest element takes 15.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Promotion nu3”.
Time to Interactive: 16.7 s
16.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.1 s
5.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 388 ms
388 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 388 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.05
0.05The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.05, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 135 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 135 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (32), scripts 1.3 MB (67) and fonts 232 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
1,003 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example SAE_nu3-Produkte_Header-Image_nature_mobile_500x500px.png at 1,500 px wide, shown at 338 px. Resized copies would save about 1,003 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
SAE_nu3-Produkte_Header-Image_nature_mobile_500x500px.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.65 g of CO₂e: 197.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 116 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
9 H1 headlines
There are 9 <h1> headlines (“nu3 chez Redcare. Profitez de votre avantage.”, “En exclusivité :” and “nu3 chez Redcare”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
245 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 245 pages on nu3.fr and 15 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Achetez tous vos produits nu3 à prix attractif. Compléments alimentaires, nutrition sportive, santé et minceur… les ess…”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “nu3 : nutrition & produits naturels pas cher | Redcare Pharmacie”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/marques/nu3/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/sitemap/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,995 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/bons-plans, https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/offres-speciales and https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/nouveau are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/nx/newsletter has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/nx/newsletter, https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/offres-speciales and https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/nouveau have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/offres-speciales and https://www.redcare-pharmacie.fr/nouveau took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 124 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
66 of 71 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,833 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,833 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 12 customer or partner logos and 7 trust badges.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nu3.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- SHOP APOTHEKE SERVICE GmbH
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on nu3.fr, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.