Website review, no card needed

odoban.com logo

odoban.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202632 issues · 81 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on odoban.com, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.0 sMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
239 ms75 msMay 2Oct 1794 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026220 ms
May 9, 2026218 ms
May 16, 2026204 ms
May 23, 2026198 ms
May 30, 2026197 ms
Jun 6, 2026200 ms
Jun 13, 2026211 ms
Jun 20, 2026207 ms
Jun 27, 2026204 ms
Jul 4, 2026212 ms
Jul 11, 2026206 ms
Jul 18, 2026206 ms
Jul 25, 2026205 ms
Aug 1, 2026202 ms
Aug 8, 2026195 ms
Aug 15, 2026195 ms
Aug 22, 2026188 ms
Aug 29, 2026173 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026108 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 202694 ms
Oct 17, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of odoban.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. odoban.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. odoban.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. odoban.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. odoban.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. odoban.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. odoban.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. odoban.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. odoban.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix54
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 282 KiB

    About 282 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, termly.io and Clarity and others), adding 736 KiB and 937 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 710 ms

    710 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 710 ms of main-thread work and 527 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 122 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (122 KiB).

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 456 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 238 KiB

    11 images could be 238 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 90 but mobile only 54. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Your largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use essential cookies to make our site work. With your c…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 637 ms

    637 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 637 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Real visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 513 ms

    513 ms

    Real visitors wait 513 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 57% faster for real visitors

    -57%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 50% faster for real visitors

    -50%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.45 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.45 g of CO₂e: 53.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 81 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 81 requests on a phone: scripts 954 KiB (40), images 455 KiB (19) and fonts 72 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9591
  • 35 text elements with low contrast

    35 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    18 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 107 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8575
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (204 characters)

    Your meta description is 204 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 93 internal links, 51 external

    The homepage links to 93 pages on odoban.com and 51 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “OdoBan® | Odor Eliminators, Disinfectants, Cleaning Products”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.odoban.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.odoban.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.odoban.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (435 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.odoban.com/product-home all use the title “OdoBan® | Odor Eliminators, Disinfectants, Cleaning Products”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages share a meta description

    https://www.odoban.com/product-home, https://www.odoban.com/products, https://www.odoban.com/categories/sprays, https://www.odoban.com/categories/gallons, https://www.odoban.com/categories/odor-absorbers and https://www.odoban.com/categories/cleaners and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.odoban.com/product-home, https://www.odoban.com/products, https://www.odoban.com/categories/sprays, https://www.odoban.com/categories/gallons, https://www.odoban.com/categories/odor-absorbers and https://www.odoban.com/categories/cleaners and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    34 of 36 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 374 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 374 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Where to Buy?”, “Where to Buy” and “Click to Subscribe”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Termly) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Termly

    A consent management tool (Termly) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at odoban.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on odoban.com, including 12 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25