Website review, no card needed
okabashi.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202640 issues · 87 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on okabashi.com, 13 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #54,938 of 97,698 reviewed websitesbeats 39%
- #34,313 of 53,229 online storesbeats 30%
- #32,561 of 48,266 Shopify storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 204 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.2 s
3.9 s
4.7 s
5.5 s
6.3 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 322 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (322 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 242 KiBAbout 242 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
5,538 HTML elements
The page has 5,538 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (accessibilityassistant.com, Shopify and Clarity and others), adding 936 KiB and 679 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
accessibilityassistant.com adds 275 ms
275 msaccessibilityassistant.com costs a phone 275 ms of main-thread work and 289 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 183 ms
183 msShopify costs a phone 183 ms of main-thread work and 334 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
41 KiBAbout 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 18 ms
18 msYour server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sYour largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 15.0 s
15.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.2 s
6.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 225 ms
225 msReal visitors wait 225 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 225 ms
225 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 225 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 664 ms
664 msReal visitors wait 664 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.046
0.046The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.046, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.3 MB in 256 requests
3.3 MBYour homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 256 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (83), other files 894 KiB (116) and images 729 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
17 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Photo_Mar_03_2024_2_14_33_PM_1024x1024.jpg at 1,024 px wide, shown at 326 px. Resized copies would save about 17 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (299 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.95 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.95 g of CO₂e: 113.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
19 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (7 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
123 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 123 pages on okabashi.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Shop now for fashionable and sustainable flip-flops, clogs, and American-made comfort shoes. Discover the Okabashi diff…”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “American-Made Comfort Shoes | Okabashi Footwear and Sandals”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.okabashi.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.okabashi.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (988 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.okabashi.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.okabashi.com/pages/loyalty-referral-programs, https://www.okabashi.com/collections/flip-flops, https://www.okabashi.com/collections/sandals-slides and https://www.okabashi.com/collections/boots have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.okabashi.com/pages/our-story and https://www.okabashi.com/pages/loyalty-referral-programs have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 62 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
145 of 154 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 917 words of copy
The homepage carries about 917 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop” and “Shop All Footwear”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop All Footwear” and “Shop Now”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 72 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
31 cookies set on arrival
31Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
52 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at okabashi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 20 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Intelligems A B Testing · Ta Mappy Store Locator Maps · Variant Image Wizard Swatch · Judge Me Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Microsoft Clarity · Triplewhale · Loop Returns · Hextom Sales Boost · Applovin Shop Integration · Upcart · Accessibility Assistant · verifypass.com · pwztag.com · salessquad.co.uk · smile.io · unpkg.com · trafficmanager.net · cloudfront.net · useamp.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Buford
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on okabashi.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.