Website review, no card needed

oldham.gov.uk logo

oldham.gov.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202629 issues · 78 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on oldham.gov.uk, 6 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
925 ms820 msMay 16Oct 31913 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026882 ms
May 23, 2026896 ms
May 30, 2026908 ms
Jun 6, 2026878 ms
Jun 13, 2026883 ms
Jun 20, 2026884 ms
Jun 27, 2026872 ms
Jul 4, 2026862 ms
Jul 11, 2026866 ms
Jul 18, 2026863 ms
Jul 25, 2026861 ms
Aug 1, 2026866 ms
Aug 8, 2026864 ms
Aug 15, 2026868 ms
Aug 22, 2026868 ms
Aug 29, 2026871 ms
Sep 5, 2026856 ms
Sep 12, 2026839 ms
Sep 19, 2026836 ms
Sep 26, 2026832 ms
Oct 3, 2026840 ms
Oct 10, 2026856 ms
Oct 17, 2026867 ms
Oct 24, 2026887 ms
Oct 31, 2026913 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
80 ms74 msMay 16Oct 3179 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202675 ms
May 23, 202676 ms
May 30, 202677 ms
Jun 6, 202678 ms
Jun 13, 202679 ms
Jun 20, 202679 ms
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202679 ms
Jul 11, 202679 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202678 ms
Aug 22, 202678 ms
Aug 29, 202679 ms
Sep 5, 202678 ms
Sep 12, 202679 ms
Sep 19, 202679 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202679 ms
Oct 10, 202679 ms
Oct 17, 202679 ms
Oct 24, 202679 ms
Oct 31, 202679 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of oldham.gov.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. oldham.gov.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. oldham.gov.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. oldham.gov.uk at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. oldham.gov.uk at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. oldham.gov.uk at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. oldham.gov.uk at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. oldham.gov.uk at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. oldham.gov.uk at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

7 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 438 KiB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (438 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    452 KiB

    2 images could be 452 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Browsealoud and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.0 MB and 347 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    305 KiB

    About 305 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Browsealoud adds 84 ms

    84 ms

    Browsealoud costs a phone 84 ms of main-thread work and 360 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    140 ms · 84 KiB

    About 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 68 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 372 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.185

    0.185

    The layout shifts by 0.185 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “To help us continually improve our website we use non-perso…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.6 s).

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 75 ms to 79 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 93 ms

    93 ms

    Real visitors wait 93 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 377 ms

    377 ms

    Real visitors wait 377 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 27 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.49 g of CO₂e: 58.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.7 MB in 54 requests

    1.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 54 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (34), images 509 KiB (3) and stylesheets 83 KiB (8). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9396
  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (3 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10077
  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Main Homepage”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (35 characters)

    Your meta description is only 35 characters: “Homepage for Oldham Council website”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 135 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 135 pages on oldham.gov.uk and 19 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Oldham Council”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.oldham.gov.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.oldham.gov.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (472 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/A, https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/B, https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/C, https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/D, https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/E and https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/F and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/J and https://www.oldham.gov.uk/a_to_z/K have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 107 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://www.google.com/cse/static/element/dc6f600a0d4404e5/default_v6+en.css' from origin …”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    59 of 64 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 240 words

    The homepage has only about 240 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Apply for social housing”, “Order, swap or repair bins” and “Apply for a school place”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at oldham.gov.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
1974

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on oldham.gov.uk, including 12 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25