Website review, no card needed

olivibra.com logo

olivibra.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202645 issues · 82 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on olivibra.com, 18 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s2.3 sMay 9Oct 243.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
228 ms99 msMay 9Oct 24195 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026125 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026144 ms
Jun 13, 2026174 ms
Jun 20, 2026195 ms
Jun 27, 2026208 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026199 ms
Jul 18, 2026193 ms
Jul 25, 2026190 ms
Aug 1, 2026194 ms
Aug 8, 2026166 ms
Aug 15, 2026141 ms
Aug 22, 2026133 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026125 ms
Sep 12, 2026123 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026171 ms
Oct 3, 2026196 ms
Oct 10, 2026204 ms
Oct 17, 2026213 ms
Oct 24, 2026195 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of olivibra.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. olivibra.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. olivibra.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. olivibra.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. olivibra.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. olivibra.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. olivibra.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. olivibra.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  8. olivibra.com at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

12 to fix33
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    550 ms · 820 KiB

    5 images could be 820 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    837 KiB

    About 837 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 114 KiB

    About 114 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    464 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (464 KiB).

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 307 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Maps adds 187 ms

    187 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 187 ms of main-thread work and 406 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

14 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.2 s

    13.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.311

    0.311

    The layout shifts by 0.311 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “OLI is the international leader in industrial vibration tec…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.5 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.20

    0.20

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 64% slower for real visitors

    +64%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 195 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Real visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 149 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 149 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (31), scripts 2.0 MB (51) and stylesheets 200 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (865 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.28 g of CO₂e: 153.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8794
  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 6 links crawlers can't follow

    6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 123 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 123 pages on olivibra.com and 16 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 85 characters

    Your meta description is 85 characters: “Industrial vibrators, flow aids and concrete poker. Electric and pneumatic vibrators.”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “OLI | The worldwide leader in vibration technology |”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.olivibra.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.olivibra.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.olivibra.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,041 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.olivibra.com/sectors is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.olivibra.com/articles and https://www.olivibra.com/product-category/sectors/energies have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.olivibra.com/about-us and https://www.olivibra.com/qsa-certification-quality-safety-environment use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The library panoramio is unknown. Please see https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/libraries”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: “0 + Active customers”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 580 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 580 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at olivibra.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on olivibra.com, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25