Website review, no card needed

olympic.sa logo

olympic.sa website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202631 issues · 73 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on olympic.sa, 8 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
113 ms87 msMay 16Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 2026100 ms
May 30, 2026103 ms
Jun 6, 2026102 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026110 ms
Jul 4, 202699 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202693 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 2026100 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202691 ms
Sep 19, 202692 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of olympic.sa (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. olympic.sa at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. olympic.sa at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. olympic.sa at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. olympic.sa at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. olympic.sa at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. olympic.sa at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. olympic.sa at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. olympic.sa at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

7 to fix62
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.2 s · 645 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (645 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    850 ms · 311 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive about 850 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    858 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 858 ms on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 306 KiB

    2 images could be 306 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    266 KiB

    About 266 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Server response: 958 ms

    958 ms

    Your server takes 958 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Fonts and Cloudflare CDN), adding 328 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 54 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Your largest element takes 7.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “logo”.

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 97 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    268 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example participants-logo.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 268 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (294 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.40 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.40 g of CO₂e: 47.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.4 MB in 25 requests

    1.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 25 requests on a phone: fonts 596 KiB (15), HTML 464 KiB (1) and images 365 KiB (7). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (68 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 68 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 27 links without text

    27 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7782
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (351 characters)

    Your meta description is 351 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 45 internal links, 43 external

    The homepage links to 45 pages on olympic.sa and 43 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Home - Saudi Olympic & Paralympic Committee”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://olympic.sa/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://olympic.sa/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://olympic.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (412 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://olympic.sa/about-us, https://olympic.sa/blog, https://olympic.sa/our-history, https://olympic.sa/our-champions, https://olympic.sa/team-saudi and https://olympic.sa/games and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://olympic.sa/about-us, https://olympic.sa/blog, https://olympic.sa/our-history, https://olympic.sa/our-champions, https://olympic.sa/team-saudi and https://olympic.sa/games and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://olympic.sa/games, https://olympic.sa/contact-us and https://olympic.sa/ar have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://olympic.sa/our-history, https://olympic.sa/our-champions, https://olympic.sa/team-saudi, https://olympic.sa/games, https://olympic.sa/gallery and https://olympic.sa/contact-us and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 256 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 256 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at olympic.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1964
Headquarters
Riyadh

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on olympic.sa, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25