Website review, no card needed

omaha.com logo

omaha.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202642 issues · 90 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on omaha.com, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms125 msMay 9Oct 24138 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026148 ms
May 16, 2026146 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026147 ms
Jun 13, 2026146 ms
Jun 20, 2026142 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026135 ms
Jul 18, 2026130 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026130 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026134 ms
Sep 12, 2026135 ms
Sep 19, 2026137 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026138 ms
Oct 17, 2026138 ms
Oct 24, 2026138 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of omaha.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. omaha.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. omaha.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  3. omaha.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  4. omaha.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  5. omaha.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  6. omaha.com at 7.7 s7.7 s
  7. omaha.com at 9.0 s9.0 s
  8. omaha.com at 10.3 s10.3 s

Speed

15 to fix24
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.3 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.9 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 11.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 24

    24/100

    Your mobile performance score is 24. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Osano CMP and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 5.8 MB and 4.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 1.9 MB

    8 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    700 ms · 1.2 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 530 ms

    530 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 530 ms of main-thread work and 2.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 114 KiB

    About 114 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Osano CMP adds 550 ms

    550 ms

    Osano CMP costs a phone 550 ms of main-thread work and 131 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 469 ms

    469 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 469 ms of main-thread work and 748 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Ad Lightning adds 450 ms

    450 ms

    Ad Lightning costs a phone 450 ms of main-thread work and 176 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 437 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,570 HTML elements

    The page has 2,570 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 68 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 68 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    1 KiB

    1 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 48 ms

    48 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 48 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Your largest element takes 13.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Omaha men's basketball has a new cast of characters. Could …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 43.4 s

    43.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.7 s

    13.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 139 ms

    139 ms

    Real visitors wait 139 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 324 ms

    324 ms

    Real visitors wait 324 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.093

    0.093

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.093, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 7.1 MB in 392 requests

    7.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.1 MB in 392 requests on a phone: scripts 4.1 MB (85), images 2.1 MB (69) and other files 616 KiB (183). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.02 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.02 g of CO₂e: 242.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9994
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (12 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9277
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (174 characters)

    Your title is 174 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Omaha News | Omaha World Herald | Read Omaha, NE and Nebraska breaking news. Get latest n…”.

  • Structured data has 8 problems

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 8 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 262 internal links, 24 external

    The homepage links to 262 pages on omaha.com and 24 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Read breaking news for Omaha, and the Midlands Region of Nebraska from the Omaha World-Herald. The latest local weather…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://omaha.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://omaha.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://omaha.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,089 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://omaha.com/news/local/education, https://omaha.com/news/local/business, https://omaha.com/news/local/business/markets-stocks and https://omaha.com/news-tip have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 148 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 28 third-party cookies

    28 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix81
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 785 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 785 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Join the community” and “Buy & Sell”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 61 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 50 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 50 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at omaha.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Segment
Hosting
LEE

Company

Founded
1885
Headquarters
Omaha

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on omaha.com, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25