Website review, no card needed

onsrud.com logo

onsrud.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202646 issues · 94 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on onsrud.com, 13 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
138 ms71 msMay 2Oct 1787 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026102 ms
May 9, 2026104 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 202686 ms
Jun 6, 2026102 ms
Jun 13, 2026121 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 202698 ms
Jul 11, 202696 ms
Jul 18, 2026102 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 2026102 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 2026110 ms
Aug 22, 2026130 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202680 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202679 ms
Oct 10, 202687 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of onsrud.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. onsrud.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. onsrud.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. onsrud.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. onsrud.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. onsrud.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. onsrud.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. onsrud.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. onsrud.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix51
  • Improve image delivery

    2.1 s · 865 KiB

    14 images could be 865 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 409 KiB

    About 409 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and ShareThis and others), adding 711 KiB and 678 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 62 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (62 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 423 ms

    423 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 423 ms of main-thread work and 548 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,644 HTML elements

    The page has 2,644 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 117 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    49 KiB

    49 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 86 but mobile only 51. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 782 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 23 ms

    23 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Your largest element takes 8.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “LMT Onsrud high-performance cutting tools”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.20

    0.20

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 867 ms

    867 ms

    Real visitors wait 867 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.17

    0.17

    The layout shifts by 0.17 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 158 ms

    158 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 158 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 99 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 99 requests on a phone: images 1.4 MB (29), scripts 990 KiB (30) and HTML 83 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (1,018 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    267 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Composites-Material-Card.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 348 px. Resized copies would save about 267 KiB.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.72 g of CO₂e: 86.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8586
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 16 links without text

    16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8370
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “LMT Onsrud LP”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 980 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 980 pages on onsrud.com and 11 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “LMT Onsrud Cutting Tools”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://onsrud.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://onsrud.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,928 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://onsrud.com/Series/Metalworking.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/Non-ferrousSlotting-Finishing.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/2FluteSlotting.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/AFS-2.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/AFNS-2.asp and https://onsrud.com/Series/AFM-2.asp and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 pages slow to respond

    https://onsrud.com/Series/AFS-2.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/AFNS-2.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/AFM-2.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/AFNM-2.asp, https://onsrud.com/Series/AFNL-2.asp and https://onsrud.com/Series/AUS-2.asp and 5 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 200 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=223004894&Ver=2&mid=8f26a48f-b355-4472-8b7e-c5ee39f77abc&bo=3&sid=75fcb720cc0911f1aad10b20067d2cfa&vid=75fcef80cc0911f1ad728947623a40f8&vids=0&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.

  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    34 of 39 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 432 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 432 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “1-800-234-1560 Call”, “Login/Register” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at onsrud.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on onsrud.com, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25