Website review, no card needed

openstax.org logo

openstax.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202635 issues · 64 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on openstax.org, 14 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s3.6 sApr 18Oct 33.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20263.9 s
Apr 25, 20264.0 s
May 2, 20264.1 s
May 9, 20264.2 s
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.4 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.2 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.1 s
Aug 1, 20264.1 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.1 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
434 ms306 msApr 18Oct 3337 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026401 ms
Apr 25, 2026409 ms
May 2, 2026419 ms
May 9, 2026415 ms
May 16, 2026415 ms
May 23, 2026414 ms
May 30, 2026405 ms
Jun 6, 2026400 ms
Jun 13, 2026387 ms
Jun 20, 2026384 ms
Jun 27, 2026394 ms
Jul 4, 2026399 ms
Jul 11, 2026405 ms
Jul 18, 2026403 ms
Jul 25, 2026393 ms
Aug 1, 2026386 ms
Aug 8, 2026379 ms
Aug 15, 2026363 ms
Aug 22, 2026345 ms
Aug 29, 2026327 ms
Sep 5, 2026321 ms
Sep 12, 2026323 ms
Sep 19, 2026326 ms
Sep 26, 2026333 ms
Oct 3, 2026337 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of openstax.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. openstax.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. openstax.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. openstax.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. openstax.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. openstax.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. openstax.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. openstax.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. openstax.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix46
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.7 s · 2.5 MB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    5.2 s · 2.2 MB

    6 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    460 ms · 162 KiB

    About 162 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 460 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 166 ms

    166 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 166 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-cookieyes.com and Crazy Egg and others), adding 393 KiB and 178 ms of main-thread time.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 157 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.34

    1.34

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.34 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    Your largest element takes 12.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Students standing in a hallway holding print and digital Op…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.509

    0.509

    The layout shifts by 0.509 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 355 ms

    355 ms

    Real visitors wait 355 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 849 ms

    849 ms

    Real visitors wait 849 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 300 ms

    300 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 300 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 401 ms to 337 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

5 to fix33
  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    763 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example homepage_hero_7PgFmgy.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 375 px. Resized copies would save about 763 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 129 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 129 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (14), scripts 779 KiB (66) and other files 135 KiB (43). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.95 g of CO₂e: 114.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9898
  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (8 characters)

    Your title is only 8 characters: “OpenStax”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “OpenStax offers free college textbooks for all types of students, making education accessible & affordable for everyone…”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://openstax.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 785 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://openstax.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 785 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 785 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get started with Assignable”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at openstax.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on openstax.org, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25