Website review, no card needed

opticalia.com logo

opticalia.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202642 issues · 88 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on opticalia.com, 17 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s4.2 sMay 16Oct 314.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.6 s
May 23, 20264.8 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.7 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.7 s
Jul 4, 20264.7 s
Jul 11, 20264.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.9 s
Jul 25, 20264.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.8 s
Aug 8, 20264.4 s
Aug 15, 20264.4 s
Aug 22, 20264.3 s
Aug 29, 20264.3 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.5 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.7 s
Oct 3, 20264.8 s
Oct 10, 20264.8 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Oct 24, 20264.6 s
Oct 31, 20264.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
310 ms155 msMay 16Oct 31246 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026292 ms
May 23, 2026276 ms
May 30, 2026280 ms
Jun 6, 2026283 ms
Jun 13, 2026284 ms
Jun 20, 2026283 ms
Jun 27, 2026278 ms
Jul 4, 2026268 ms
Jul 11, 2026262 ms
Jul 18, 2026256 ms
Jul 25, 2026248 ms
Aug 1, 2026241 ms
Aug 8, 2026190 ms
Aug 15, 2026173 ms
Aug 22, 2026174 ms
Aug 29, 2026175 ms
Sep 5, 2026193 ms
Sep 12, 2026273 ms
Sep 19, 2026263 ms
Sep 26, 2026257 ms
Oct 3, 2026259 ms
Oct 10, 2026253 ms
Oct 17, 2026254 ms
Oct 24, 2026253 ms
Oct 31, 2026246 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of opticalia.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. opticalia.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. opticalia.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. opticalia.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. opticalia.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  5. opticalia.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  6. opticalia.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  7. opticalia.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  8. opticalia.com at 6.2 s6.2 s

Speed

8 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 2.0 MB

    16 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Stripe and TikTok and others), adding 733 KiB and 534 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 375 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (375 KiB).

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 294 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Stripe adds 136 ms

    136 ms

    Stripe costs a phone 136 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    25 KiB

    About 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 190 ms

    190 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 190 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Real visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.7 s

    16.7 s

    Your largest element takes 16.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.2 s

    27.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.9 s

    14.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 858 ms

    858 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 858 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 296 ms

    296 ms

    Real visitors wait 296 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.10

    0.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 292 ms to 246 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix40
  • Page weight: 6.9 MB in 144 requests

    6.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 144 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (37), scripts 2.5 MB (43) and fonts 191 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    1.5 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Diseno_sin_titulo_1_2984146428.png at 886 px wide, shown at 167 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.

  • 17 images in older formats

    17 images (2.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.95 g of CO₂e: 234.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7286
  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 17 links without text

    17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 12 form fields without a label

    12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 47 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9276
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (72 characters)

    Your title is 72 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Opticalia, gafas graduadas, gafas de sol y lentillas | Marcas exclusivas”.

  • Meta description is long (323 characters)

    Your meta description is 323 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 171 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 171 pages on opticalia.com and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.opticalia.com/es.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.opticalia.com/es/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (676 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /es/pedir-cita and /es/sol/ninos use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /es/pedir-cita and /es/graduadas/nino have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    /es/easy-click, /es/editorial/easy-click, /es/sol, /es/sol/ninos, /es/accesorios and /es/graduadas/nino took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 15 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 267 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 267 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 35 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at opticalia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on opticalia.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25