Website review, no card needed

osgtool.com logo

osgtool.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202648 issues · 111 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on osgtool.com, 18 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
158 ms116 msMay 9Oct 24129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026121 ms
May 16, 2026126 ms
May 23, 2026130 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026131 ms
Jun 13, 2026126 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026125 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026151 ms
Jul 18, 2026153 ms
Jul 25, 2026146 ms
Aug 1, 2026140 ms
Aug 8, 2026143 ms
Aug 15, 2026150 ms
Aug 22, 2026153 ms
Aug 29, 2026151 ms
Sep 5, 2026151 ms
Sep 12, 2026140 ms
Sep 19, 2026147 ms
Sep 26, 2026146 ms
Oct 3, 2026134 ms
Oct 10, 2026133 ms
Oct 17, 2026123 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of osgtool.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. osgtool.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. osgtool.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. osgtool.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. osgtool.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. osgtool.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. osgtool.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. osgtool.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  8. osgtool.com at 4.4 s4.4 s

osgtool.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

16 to fix36
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    15.0 s · 3.7 MB

    About 3.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 15.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.0 s · 1.0 MB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.3 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 494 KiB

    4 images could be 494 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (smartsheet.com, Google CDN and FontAwesome CDN and others), adding 7.3 MB and 3.0 s of main-thread time.

  • smartsheet.com adds 823 ms

    823 ms

    smartsheet.com costs a phone 823 ms of main-thread work and 3.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    770 ms · 246 KiB

    About 246 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 770 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 760 ms

    760 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 760 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 672 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Bigcommerce adds 320 ms

    320 ms

    Bigcommerce costs a phone 320 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 347 ms

    347 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 347 ms of main-thread work and 102 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • netlify.app adds 293 ms

    293 ms

    netlify.app costs a phone 293 ms of main-thread work and 490 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    300 ms · 36 KiB

    36 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,795 HTML elements

    The page has 1,795 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 45 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 27.8 s

    27.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 27.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 35.2 s

    35.2 s

    Your largest element takes 35.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Shaping Your Dreams”.

  • Speed Index: 27.8 s

    27.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 27.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 42.2 s

    42.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 42.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 824 ms

    824 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 824 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Real visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 469 ms

    469 ms

    Real visitors wait 469 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 14.1 MB in 127 requests

    14.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.1 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 6.7 MB (61), media 5.9 MB (1) and images 548 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.00 g of CO₂e: 479.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 7790
  • Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used (1 element)

    Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 5 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 31 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 1 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9275
  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “OSG USA, INC.”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (285 characters)

    Your meta description is 285 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://osgtool.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 451 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 451 pages on osgtool.com and 9 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Shaping Your Dreams”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://osgtool.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /all-brands, /brands/a-brand, /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-pot, /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-sft, /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-cht and /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-csf and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /all-brands, /brands/a-brand, /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-pot, /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-sft, /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-cht and /brands/a-brand/a-brand-a-csf and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9674
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://osgtool.com/favicon.ico.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (osgtool.com).

  • Valid certificate (37 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for osgtool.com and is valid for another 37 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://osgtool.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    osgtool.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    osgtool.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 26 years old

    26 years

    osgtool.com was registered in Apr 2000 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2028

    osgtool.com is registered until Apr 2028.

Content and conversion

4 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 37 words

    The homepage has only about 37 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Register” and “Try Now”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

2 to fix60
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be osgtool.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 60/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:12.218.202.66 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
BigCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Black Lotus;OVH

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on osgtool.com, including 24 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25