Website review, no card needed

oziva.com logo

oziva.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202651 issues · 91 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on oziva.com, 19 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 40.9 MB in 181 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.0 sAug 22Nov 72.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Nov 7, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
452 ms372 msAug 22Nov 7409 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Aug 22, 2026443 ms
Aug 29, 2026431 ms
Sep 5, 2026416 ms
Sep 12, 2026381 ms
Sep 19, 2026381 ms
Sep 26, 2026409 ms
Oct 3, 2026405 ms
Oct 10, 2026397 ms
Oct 17, 2026404 ms
Oct 24, 2026405 ms
Oct 31, 2026408 ms
Nov 7, 2026409 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of oziva.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. oziva.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. oziva.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. oziva.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. oziva.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. oziva.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. oziva.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. oziva.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. oziva.com at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

7 to fix69
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.2 s · 210 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (210 KiB).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Facebook and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 40.9 MB and 760 ms of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 465 ms

    465 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 465 ms of main-thread work and 40.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 3.0 MB

    33 images could be 3.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 367 KiB

    About 367 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 41 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 130 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 960 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Your largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Banner_Daily Fat Metabolism”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 334 ms

    334 ms

    Real visitors wait 334 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.14

    0.14

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.14 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • 70 images without width and height

    70 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 443 ms to 409 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 627 ms

    627 ms

    Real visitors wait 627 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 29% faster for real visitors

    -29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 40.9 MB in 181 requests

    40.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 40.9 MB in 181 requests on a phone: media 35.9 MB (5), images 3.8 MB (83) and scripts 932 KiB (58). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Twinkle.gif weighs 518 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    916 KiB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Twinkle.gif at 500 px wide, shown at 24 px. Resized copies would save about 916 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (767 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (302 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 11.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    11.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 11.60 g of CO₂e: 1392.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 6181
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (29 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements (2 elements)

    <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Headings should not be empty (72 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 72 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 13 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 5845
  • Page is set to noindex

    The robots meta tag says “noindex, nofollow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Blocked from indexing

    Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.

  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “OZiva | No.1 Choice for Clean, Plant based Nutrition & Beauty Products”.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.oziva.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 13 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 13 pages on oziva.com and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Buy OZiva's Clean, Plant based Products Online. Only Certified Clean Label brand in India by US CLP. Visit Now. Free Sh…”.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix58
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    13%

    A phone browser shows 448 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 59. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.oziva.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 6 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.oziva.com/products/daily-fat-metabolism, https://www.oziva.com/collections/new-launches, https://www.oziva.com/pages/order-history, https://www.oziva.com/collections/build-your-own-box, https://www.oziva.com/pages/my-oziva-cash and https://www.oziva.com/pages/contact-us are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.oziva.com/products/daily-fat-metabolism has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.oziva.com/pages/order-history, https://www.oziva.com/pages/my-oziva-cash and https://www.oziva.com/pages/contact-us use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.oziva.com/products/daily-fat-metabolism, https://www.oziva.com/collections/new-launches, https://www.oziva.com/pages/order-history, https://www.oziva.com/collections/build-your-own-box, https://www.oziva.com/pages/my-oziva-cash and https://www.oziva.com/pages/contact-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 internal pages checked

    We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://pulse.prod.oziva.com/session/send' violates the following Content Security Policy directive: "co…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    86 of 87 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix57
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 448 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 448 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Track Order” and “Contact Us”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Track Order”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at oziva.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on oziva.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25