Website review, no card needed
p3-group.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202631 issues · 79 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on p3-group.com, 13 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.4 s46 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.4 s.
Reduce unused CSS
3.3 s · 655 KiBAbout 655 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
3.2 MB21 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 677 KiBAbout 677 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 848 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,410 HTML elements
The page has 2,410 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 90 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (dev-p3.com), adding 1 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
1 checks passed
Server response: 186 ms
186 msYour server sent the HTML in 186 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.3 s
5.3 sReal visitors wait 5.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.9 s
8.9 sYour largest element takes 8.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “P3 – TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANCY BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY AI ENGINEER…”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.8 s
16.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.7 s
7.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 150 ms
150 msReal visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 70 ms
70 msScripts block the page for only 70 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 26.9 MB in 184 requests
26.9 MBYour homepage downloads 26.9 MB in 184 requests on a phone: images 24.0 MB (93), scripts 1.2 MB (40) and stylesheets 963 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (84 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (84 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 7.6 g of CO₂ per visit
7.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.64 g of CO₂e: 916.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 57 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“P3 names T-Mobile the Mobile Network Test Champio…”, “P3 names T-Mobile the Mobile Network Test Champio…” and “P3 names T-Mobile the Mobile Network Test Champio…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
152 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 152 pages on p3-group.com and 4 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “P3 is an independent technology consultancy uniting software, engineering, AI and advisory- from first vision to workin…”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “P3 Group | Technology, AI & Engineering Consultancy”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://p3-group.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://p3-group.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,273 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://p3-group.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 45 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages share 2 titles
https://p3-group.com/services/automotive and https://p3-group.com/p3_industry/automotive all use the title “Automotive Consulting & Engineering | P3 Group”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages share a meta description
https://p3-group.com/services/automotive and https://p3-group.com/p3_industry/automotive use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://p3-group.com/services/automotive, whose canonical is https://p3-group.com/p3_industry/automotive. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
5 pages slow to respond
https://p3-group.com/company, https://p3-group.com/company/about-p3, https://p3-group.com/company/p3-management, https://p3-group.com/company/p3-locations and https://p3-group.com/services/automotive took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 559 words of copy
The homepage carries about 559 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “join our team” and “Call us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 8 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 other company contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at p3-group.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- IONOS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 18 open roles
- Job board
- breezy
Company
- Founded
- 1996
- Headquarters
- Aachen
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on p3-group.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.