Website review, no card needed
paard.nl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 82 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on paard.nl, 13 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 743 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 758 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 745 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 757 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 736 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 717 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 741 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 732 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 756 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 769 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 770 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 765 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 755 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 775 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 793 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 800 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 790 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 766 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 737 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 734 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 733 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 747 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 758 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 747 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 741 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 118 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
11.3 s · 3.1 MB12 images could be 3.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 496 KiBAbout 496 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 91 KiBAbout 91 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Vimeo and wiqhit.com and others), adding 1.1 MB and 320 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 246 ms
246 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 246 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Vimeo adds 36 ms
36 msVimeo costs a phone 36 ms of main-thread work and 518 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 190 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (190 KiB).
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 150 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 735 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s
15.6 sYour largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 24.5 s
24.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.9 s
8.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 383 ms
383 msReal visitors wait 383 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 105 ms
105 msScripts block the page for only 105 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 71 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 71 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (22), scripts 1.0 MB (20) and fonts 199 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
2.2 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example PRDps_Mailheader_GERSON.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 116 px. Resized copies would save about 2.2 MB.
12 images in older formats
12 images (3.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (658 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.43 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.43 g of CO₂e: 172.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (5 characters)
Your title is only 5 characters: “PAARD”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (65 characters)
Your meta description is only 65 characters: “Paard is sinds begin jaren '70 dé poptempel en club van Den Haag.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
61 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on paard.nl and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “HAAGS POPGALA 2026”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.paard.nl/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.paard.nl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.paard.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (541 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.paard.nl/winkelwagen is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.paard.nl/en all use the title “PAARD”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages without a meta description
https://www.paard.nl/winkelwagen, https://www.paard.nl/event, https://www.paard.nl/veelgestelde-vragen, https://www.paard.nl/steun-paard, https://www.paard.nl/nieuws and https://www.paard.nl/albums and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.paard.nl/event has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“`StorageType.persistent` is deprecated. Please use standardized `navigator.storage` instead.”).
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
24 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 439 words of copy
The homepage carries about 439 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact & Locatie”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at paard.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on paard.nl, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.