Website review, no card needed
pacificpulm.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202639 issues · 90 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on pacificpulm.com, 8 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 91 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.4 s
4.9 s
7.3 s
9.8 s
12.2 s
14.7 s
17.1 s
19.6 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 83
83/100Your mobile performance score is 83. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, jQuery CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.2 MB and 778 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
588 KiBAbout 588 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
577 KiB10 images could be 577 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 459 ms
459 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 459 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 135 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
22 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 19.2 s
19.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.8 s
11.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 71 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 212 ms
212 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 212 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sYour largest element renders in 2.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Riverside Location | 4234 Riverwalk Parkway, Suite 230, Riv…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.027
0.027The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.027, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 106 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 106 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (23), scripts 1.4 MB (35) and other files 370 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images in older formats
6 images (519 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (223 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.09 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.09 g of CO₂e: 131.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
25 text elements with low contrast
25 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
6 links crawlers can't follow
6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
125 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 125 pages on pacificpulm.com and 10 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “At Pacific Pulmonary Medical Group we strive for the excellent patient care; high quality services. Call 951-781-3672 t…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Our Locations”.
Title: 31 characters
Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Pacific Pulmonary Medical Group”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://pacificpulm.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pacificpulm.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://pacificpulm.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,042 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/dr-samer-kanaan is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages share a title
https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/ahmed-el-bershawi-md, https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/ahmed-el-bershawi-md-2 and https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/sonja-knittel-hliddal all use the title “Ahmed El-Bershawi, MD - Riverside Physician”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/ali-mojaverian, https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/faraz-afridi, https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/mindy-bui-do, https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/zeron-ghazarian-md, https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/mindy-bui-do-2 and https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/liliana-mendoza-do and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/ahmed-el-bershawi-md, https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/ahmed-el-bershawi-md-2 and https://pacificpulm.com/meet-providers/sonja-knittel-hliddal use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to set referrer policy: The value '' is not one of 'no-referrer', 'no-referrer-when-downgrade', 'origin', 'origi…”.
4 distorted images
4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 376 words of copy
The homepage carries about 376 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request an Appointment”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request an Appointment” and “Appointment Request”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pacificpulm.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Rackspace
Company
- Employees
- 70
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on pacificpulm.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.