Website review, no card needed

paradata.org.uk logo

paradata.org.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 79 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on paradata.org.uk, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.6 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
106 ms91 msMay 2Oct 17100 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202699 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 2026101 ms
Jul 25, 2026102 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 202698 ms
Aug 15, 202697 ms
Aug 22, 2026100 ms
Aug 29, 202699 ms
Sep 5, 2026100 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026102 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 2026100 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of paradata.org.uk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. paradata.org.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. paradata.org.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. paradata.org.uk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. paradata.org.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. paradata.org.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. paradata.org.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. paradata.org.uk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. paradata.org.uk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix57
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.3 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 690 KiB

    About 690 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Amazon Web Services and Google Analytics and others), adding 2.3 MB and 796 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 680 ms

    680 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 680 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 124 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (124 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 50 KiB

    About 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 89 ms

    89 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 89 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 188 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    81 KiB

    2 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 576 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.7 s

    13.7 s

    Your largest element takes 13.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.9 s

    13.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 280 ms

    280 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 280 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Real visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 685 ms

    685 ms

    Real visitors wait 685 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 42 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 42 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (14), images 809 KiB (15) and fonts 122 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    54 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Facebook_Logo_Primary.png at 2,084 px wide, shown at 29 px. Resized copies would save about 54 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (54 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.65 g of CO₂e: 77.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8890
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9272
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is long (88 characters)

    Your title is 88 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “A living history of The Parachute Regiment and Airborne Forces - Airborne Assault Museum”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 27 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on paradata.org.uk and 8 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “A living history of The Parachute Regiment and Airborne Forces”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://paradata.org.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://paradata.org.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (386 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix65
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://paradata.org.uk/subscription/subscribe, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://paradata.org.uk/donate, https://paradata.org.uk/recruitment, https://paradata.org.uk/contact, https://paradata.org.uk/roll-call, https://paradata.org.uk/equipment-weaponry and https://paradata.org.uk/timeline and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://paradata.org.uk/timeline has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://pastview-assets.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/org/110/site/css/custom.css?2314333625'…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 338 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 338 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Join Us”, “Join the Paras” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at paradata.org.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Founded
1946

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on paradata.org.uk, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25