Website review, no card needed
parksproject.us website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202655 issues · 106 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on parksproject.us, 21 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 41.8 MB in 504 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #80,149 of 95,734 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #46,488 of 51,702 online storesbeats 8%
- #42,832 of 46,804 Shopify storesbeats 7%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 294 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.8 s
3.5 s
5.3 s
7.0 s
8.8 s
10.5 s
12.3 s
14.1 s
Speed
Signyfyd adds 2.5 s
2.5 sSignyfyd costs a phone 2.5 s of main-thread work and 521 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 23.7 s
A phone's processor spends 23.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,068 HTML elements
The page has 3,068 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Signyfyd, Google Tag Manager and Yotpo and others), adding 31.2 MB and 3.9 s of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 183 ms
183 msShopify costs a phone 183 ms of main-thread work and 29.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
160 ms · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 490 KiB14 images could be 490 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 780 KiB65 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (780 KiB).
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 782 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
310 ms · 94 KiBAbout 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 312 ms
312 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 333 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Yotpo adds 241 ms
241 msYotpo costs a phone 241 ms of main-thread work and 401 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ZenDesk adds 151 ms
151 msZenDesk costs a phone 151 ms of main-thread work and 394 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Minify JavaScript
61 KiB61 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 615 ms
615 msReal visitors wait 615 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.4 s
9.4 sYour largest element takes 9.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Banner Image”.
Speed Index: 22.9 s
22.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 22.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 49.8 s
49.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 49.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.6 s
3.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 91% slower for real visitors
+91%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 294 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 118 ms
118 msReal visitors wait 118 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 32% faster for real visitors
-32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 41.8 MB in 504 requests
41.8 MBYour homepage downloads 41.8 MB in 504 requests on a phone: media 29.3 MB (3), images 7.4 MB (119) and scripts 3.7 MB (181). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Parks-Project-Carry-Over-3x4-Edit-2-(3)-1-(1)-v1770146653965 weighs 583 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images far larger than shown
974 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Parks-Project-Carry-Over-3x4-Edit-2-(3)-1-(1)-v1770146653965 at 2,160 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 974 KiB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Parks-Project-Carry-Over-3x4-Edit-2-(3)-1-(1)-v1770146653965 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (115 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (115 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 11.9 g of CO₂ per visit
11.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 11.86 g of CO₂e: 1422.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (18 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (247 characters)
Your meta description is 247 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
208 internal links, 27 external
The homepage links to 208 pages on parksproject.us and 27 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “National Parks Apparel & Gear Made with Purpose – Parks Project”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.parksproject.us/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.parksproject.us/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,808 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.parksproject.us/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.parksproject.us/collections/all-gifts, https://www.parksproject.us/pages/outkast-x-parks-project, https://www.parksproject.us/pages/defend and https://www.parksproject.us/pages/howling-wolf have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.parksproject.us/collections/new-arrivals, https://www.parksproject.us/collections/all-gifts, https://www.parksproject.us/pages/outkast-x-parks-project, https://www.parksproject.us/pages/defend, https://www.parksproject.us/collections/best-sellers and https://www.parksproject.us/collections/shop-by-park and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://www.parksproject.us/pages/outkast-x-parks-project, https://www.parksproject.us/pages/defend and https://www.parksproject.us/pages/howling-wolf have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.parksproject.us/collections/tees and https://www.parksproject.us/collections/apparel took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=5562041&Ver=2&mid=20283ca1-2c37-481d-8174-e31dc2b0f904&bo=2&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=National%20Parks%20Apparel%20%26%20Gear%20Made%20with%20.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “_n is not defined”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
117 of 127 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 770 words of copy
The homepage carries about 770 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up” and “Gift Shop - Fall Edit”.
46 calls to action
The homepage has 46 calls to action, for example “Gift Shop - Fall Edit”, “Shop By Park” and “Shop All Products”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight.
Privacy and tracking
11 trackers load before any consent
11Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
83 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 83 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at parksproject.us, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 23 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Black Crow Ai That Delivers · Crazy Egg · Wunderkind · Savedby Package Protection · Yotpo Product Reviews · Depict Search Merchandising · Simple Bundle · Ai Accessibility · Parks Gwp Cart Transformer · identixweb.com · amazonaws.com · jsdelivr.net · nfcube.com · revy.io · global-e.com · klaviyo.com · arhamcommerce.com · getredo.com · cloudfront.net · postscript.io · signifyd.com · klck.dev · useamp.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Marina Del Rey
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on parksproject.us, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.