Website review, no card needed

partakefoods.com logo

partakefoods.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202632 issues · 79 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on partakefoods.com, 10 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.1 sMay 23Nov 71.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Nov 7, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
169 ms124 msMay 23Nov 7131 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026139 ms
Jun 6, 2026144 ms
Jun 13, 2026149 ms
Jun 20, 2026140 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026151 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026132 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026146 ms
Aug 29, 2026158 ms
Sep 5, 2026164 ms
Sep 12, 2026150 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026146 ms
Oct 3, 2026145 ms
Oct 10, 2026149 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms
Oct 24, 2026138 ms
Oct 31, 2026133 ms
Nov 7, 2026131 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of partakefoods.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. partakefoods.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. partakefoods.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. partakefoods.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. partakefoods.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. partakefoods.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. partakefoods.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. partakefoods.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. partakefoods.com at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

8 to fix56
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 556 KiB

    About 556 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.1 s · 304 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (304 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 1.3 MB

    17 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.2 MB and 719 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 323 ms

    323 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 323 ms of main-thread work and 493 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 952 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 250 ms.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 217 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    26 KiB

    About 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.9 s

    20.9 s

    Your largest element takes 20.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 343 ms

    343 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 343 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 174 ms

    174 ms

    Real visitors wait 174 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 538 ms

    538 ms

    Real visitors wait 538 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix50
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 277 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 277 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (39), scripts 1.4 MB (91) and other files 733 KiB (100). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    727 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Partake_Cookie_1.png at 1,526 px wide, shown at 159 px. Resized copies would save about 727 KiB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (206 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.24 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.24 g of CO₂e: 148.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9794
  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 133 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Meta description is long (284 characters)

    Your meta description is 284 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 78 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 78 pages on partakefoods.com and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Partake Foods | Super Delicious Cookies”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://partakefoods.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://partakefoods.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (545 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://partakefoods.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://partakefoods.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://partakefoods.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://partakefoods.com/collections/all, https://partakefoods.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://partakefoods.com/collections/full-lineup, https://partakefoods.com/blogs/all, https://partakefoods.com/collections/cookies-1 and https://partakefoods.com/collections/mini-cookies-1 and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://partakefoods.com/collections/all, https://partakefoods.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://partakefoods.com/collections/full-lineup, https://partakefoods.com/pages/about, https://partakefoods.com/pages/faq and https://partakefoods.com/collections/cookies-1 and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    36 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 378 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 378 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop Your Daily Snack Rotation” and “Learn More”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 6 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at partakefoods.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Consentmo Gdpr · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gdpr Backpack · Accessibly App · onthemapmarketing.com · bazaarvoice.com · b-cdn.net · gorgias.chat · 9gtb.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on partakefoods.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25