Website review, no card needed

pathe.nl logo

pathe.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202641 issues · 85 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on pathe.nl, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
787 ms484 msMay 16Oct 31752 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026523 ms
May 23, 2026519 ms
May 30, 2026526 ms
Jun 6, 2026533 ms
Jun 13, 2026528 ms
Jun 20, 2026521 ms
Jun 27, 2026538 ms
Jul 4, 2026556 ms
Jul 11, 2026586 ms
Jul 18, 2026619 ms
Jul 25, 2026619 ms
Aug 1, 2026631 ms
Aug 8, 2026636 ms
Aug 15, 2026637 ms
Aug 22, 2026636 ms
Aug 29, 2026627 ms
Sep 5, 2026608 ms
Sep 12, 2026588 ms
Sep 19, 2026577 ms
Sep 26, 2026569 ms
Oct 3, 2026592 ms
Oct 10, 2026626 ms
Oct 17, 2026677 ms
Oct 24, 2026739 ms
Oct 31, 2026752 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pathe.nl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pathe.nl at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. pathe.nl at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. pathe.nl at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. pathe.nl at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. pathe.nl at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. pathe.nl at 6.0 s6.0 s
  7. pathe.nl at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. pathe.nl at 8.1 s8.1 s

Speed

9 to fix36
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.7 s · 233 KiB

    152 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (233 KiB).

  • 17,624 HTML elements

    The page has 17,624 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.5 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 478 KiB

    About 478 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 79 KiB

    About 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 171 ms

    171 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 171 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Didomi and mPulse and others), adding 743 KiB and 288 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 49 KiB

    5 images could be 49 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 194 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    Your largest element takes 9.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.9 s

    16.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 523 ms to 752 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 598 ms

    598 ms

    Real visitors wait 598 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.042

    0.042

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.042, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 219 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 219 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (147), HTML 480 KiB (3) and images 271 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    10 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example carnaval-st-1-jpg-sd-low-fotograaf-boas-van-milligen-bielke- at 1,080 px wide, shown at 322 px. Resized copies would save about 10 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (117 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.68 g of CO₂e: 81.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8287
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (71 characters)

    Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pathé Netherlands Cinemas: Films, Cinema releases, E-tickets, Schedules”.

  • Meta description is long (171 characters)

    Your meta description is 171 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://www.pathe.fr)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 201 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 201 pages on pathe.nl and 3 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.pathe.nl/en.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.pathe.nl/sitemaps/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.pathe.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,139 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.pathe.nl/en and https://www.pathe.nl/en/info/club-pathe all use the title “Pathé Netherlands cinemas: Films, Cinema releases, E-tickets, Schedul…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.pathe.nl/en/films has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.pathe.nl/en/films/godzilla-minus-zero-japanese-english-subs-54841 and https://www.pathe.nl/en/films/godzilla-minus-zero-nederlands-ondertiteld-56215 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.pathe.nl/en/films/verity-50915, https://www.pathe.nl/en/films/de-grote-sinterklaasfilm-en-de-vliegende-pieten-55105 and https://www.pathe.nl/en/films/de-club-van-sinterklaasfilm-paniek-in-het-pietendorp-55104 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 91 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 270 small tap targets

    270 of 462 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,916 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,916 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book now”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Book now”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Didomi

    A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pathe.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Akamai

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on pathe.nl, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25