Website review, no card needed
paustian.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202628 issues · 79 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on paustian.com, 7 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86B- #9,265 of 93,301 reviewed websitesbeats 86%
- #5,384 of 49,812 online storesbeats 85%
- #106 of 2,209 WooCommerce storesbeats 94%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 701 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 721 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 754 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 729 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 750 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 799 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 772 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 817 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 784 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 757 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 754 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 738 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 728 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 713 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 733 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 722 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 697 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 749 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 886 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 82 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 73 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 74 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 78 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 674 KiB79 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (674 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 69
69/100Your mobile performance score is 69 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 167 KiBAbout 167 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 114 KiBAbout 114 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 177 ms
177 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 177 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and Google Analytics), adding 421 KiB and 177 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 103 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
86 KiB3 images could be 86 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 451 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 360 ms
360 msYour server sent the HTML in 360 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.6 s
8.6 sYour largest element takes 8.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 8.6 s
8.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 119% slower for real visitors
+119%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 924 ms
924 msReal visitors wait 924 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.5 s
5.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 82 ms to 78 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 78 ms
78 msReal visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 87 ms
87 msScripts block the page for only 87 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
3 images far larger than shown
151 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Fjordenhus_121977-e1773990120406.webp at 1,764 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 151 KiB.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.40 g of CO₂e: 48.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 1.4 MB in 85 requests
1.4 MBYour homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 85 requests on a phone: scripts 614 KiB (49), images 377 KiB (28) and fonts 249 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
79 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 79 pages on paustian.com and 5 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 138 characters
Your meta description is 138 characters: “Kurateret dansk og internationalt møbeldesign til kontorer, hoteller og offentlige rum. Showroom i Værløse, Aarhus og H…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Professionelle rum, der bliver husket”.
Title: 49 characters
Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “Designmøbler til erhverv og arkitektur : Paustian”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://paustian.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://paustian.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (535 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://paustian.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 20 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://paustian.com/shop has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “!!!!!! OnPay.io Javascript should always be loaded from https://onpay.io/ !!!!!!”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 22 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 178 words
The homepage has only about 178 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at paustian.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- React
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1964
- Headquarters
- Paustian House
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on paustian.com, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.