Website review, no card needed
permablend.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202637 issues · 87 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on permablend.com, 11 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #60,974 of 108,423 reviewed websitesbeats 39%
- #39,570 of 61,494 online storesbeats 31%
- #37,701 of 56,117 Shopify storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 184 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 4.8 s
A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 798 KiBAbout 798 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 362 ms
362 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 362 ms of main-thread work and 506 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
370 KiB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (370 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 54 KiBAbout 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
2,496 HTML elements
The page has 2,496 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Shopify adds 166 ms
166 msShopify costs a phone 166 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 126 ms
126 msKlaviyo costs a phone 126 ms of main-thread work and 353 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 218 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
63 KiB7 images could be 63 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
49 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Duplicated JavaScript
20 KiB20 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 24.1 s
24.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 274 ms
274 msReal visitors wait 274 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 426 ms
426 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 426 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
29 images without width and height
29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 669 ms
669 msReal visitors wait 669 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 42% faster for real visitors
-42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.8 MB in 440 requests
4.8 MBYour homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 440 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (142), images 1,022 KiB (58) and other files 936 KiB (169). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (408 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (284 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.35 g of CO₂e: 161.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
92 text elements with low contrast
92 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
39 tap targets too small
39 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links must have discernible text (4 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 80 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 7 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “Perma Blend”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (56 characters)
Your meta description is only 56 characters: “Perma Blend Permanent Makeup | Premium Cosmetic Pigments”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
242 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 242 pages on permablend.com and 19 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://permablend.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://permablend.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,169 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://permablend.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without an H1
https://permablend.com/collections/black, https://permablend.com/collections/brown, https://permablend.com/collections/auburn, https://permablend.com/collections/blondes, https://permablend.com/collections/yellow and https://permablend.com/collections/pink and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 118 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Shopify is not defined”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 538 words of copy
The homepage carries about 538 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
28 calls to action
The homepage has 28 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop All Singles” and “Shop All Products”.
14 short forms
14 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and TikTok Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
32 cookies set on arrival
32Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
47 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at permablend.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 19 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Geo Pro Geolocation · Yoast Seo · Seowill Redirects · Judge Me Reviews · Swatch King · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Contact Form Ultimate · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Uppromote Affiliate · Attentive · Tapcart Mobile App · Easylocation · Variant Image Swatch · Selleasy · Affliate By Secomapp · amazonaws.com · nfcube.com · attn.tv · googleapis.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Vue.js
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on permablend.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.