Website review, no card needed
pesca.restaurant website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202636 issues · 83 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on pesca.restaurant, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.5 s
3.8 s
5.0 s
6.3 s
7.5 s
8.8 s
10.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.4 s · 522 KiBAbout 522 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 9.3 s
A phone's processor spends 9.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
50 ms · 4.2 MB42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.2 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (formitable.com, Google Tag Manager and qooqie.com and others), adding 4.9 MB and 855 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
859 KiB11 images could be 859 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
formitable.com adds 332 ms
332 msformitable.com costs a phone 332 ms of main-thread work and 541 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Azure Web Services adds 0 ms
0 msAzure Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 3.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 276 ms
276 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 276 ms of main-thread work and 501 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
54 KiBAbout 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 80 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 88 ms
88 msYour server sent the HTML in 88 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.53
0.53For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.53 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sYour largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide s…”.
Time to Interactive: 19.1 s
19.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.6 s
10.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 34% slower for real visitors
+34%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 98% slower for real visitors
+98%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 892 ms
892 msReal visitors wait 892 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.201
0.201The layout shifts by 0.201 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 129 ms
129 msReal visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 189 ms
189 msScripts block the page for only 189 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 101 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 101 requests on a phone: images 5.2 MB (20), scripts 1.3 MB (49) and fonts 162 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (92 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.94 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.94 g of CO₂e: 232.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
36 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 36 pages on pesca.restaurant and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pesca header video”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Pesca - Theatre of Fish - Seafood restaurant Amsterdam”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://pesca.restaurant/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pesca.restaurant/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://pesca.restaurant/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (607 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://pesca.restaurant/fr and https://pesca.restaurant/de all use the title “Home - Pesca”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
https://pesca.restaurant/locations, https://pesca.restaurant/about, https://pesca.restaurant/faq, https://pesca.restaurant/blogs, https://pesca.restaurant/fr and https://pesca.restaurant/de and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://pesca.restaurant/blogs has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
18 small tap targets
18 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “GA4 is not defined or Measurement ID is missing”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 648 words of copy
The homepage carries about 648 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a table Book a table”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Book a table Book a table”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 4 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pesca.restaurant, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Hoasted
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on pesca.restaurant, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.