Website review, no card needed

peterdobias.com logo

peterdobias.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202632 issues · 82 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on peterdobias.com, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.3 sMay 16Oct 312.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Oct 31, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
168 ms114 msMay 16Oct 31162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026154 ms
May 23, 2026137 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026126 ms
Jun 13, 2026126 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026125 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026126 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026126 ms
Aug 29, 2026127 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026142 ms
Oct 3, 2026145 ms
Oct 10, 2026146 ms
Oct 17, 2026152 ms
Oct 24, 2026162 ms
Oct 31, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of peterdobias.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. peterdobias.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. peterdobias.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. peterdobias.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. peterdobias.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. peterdobias.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. peterdobias.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. peterdobias.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. peterdobias.com at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

9 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Main-thread work: 6.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Convert Insights and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 734 KiB

    About 734 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 115 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (115 KiB).

  • YouTube adds 561 ms

    561 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 561 ms of main-thread work and 985 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 283 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,202 HTML elements

    The page has 2,202 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    153 KiB

    10 images could be 153 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    128 KiB

    About 128 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.0 s

    18.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Your largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Dr. Peter Dobias — natural dog health | Dr. Dobias”.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 435 ms

    435 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 435 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 126 ms

    126 ms

    Real visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 320 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 320 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (99), other files 750 KiB (93) and images 671 KiB (90). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.01 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.01 g of CO₂e: 121.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8891
  • Hidden but focusable

    31 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 89 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Dr. Peter Dobias - Holistic Veterinarian – Dr. Dobias International”.

  • 266 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 266 pages on peterdobias.com and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “All natural supplements and products for dogs. Dr. Dobias is a holistic veterinarian and an expert in natural nutrition…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Helping dogs and their people naturally thrive”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://peterdobias.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://peterdobias.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,069 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://peterdobias.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://peterdobias.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://peterdobias.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://peterdobias.com/customer_authentication/redirect and https://peterdobias.com/pages/recipe-maker have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://peterdobias.com/pages/customer-reviews, https://peterdobias.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://peterdobias.com/collections/all, https://peterdobias.com/blogs/blog and https://peterdobias.com/blogs/article have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 100 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7397
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    62 of 63 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,671 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,671 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Dog Supplements” and “Shop Human Supplements”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Join Our Pack” and “Shop dog Supplements”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 198 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 5 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 39 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at peterdobias.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Microsoft Clarity · Uppromote Affiliate · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Convert Experiences · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Affliate By Secomapp · Convert Web Pixel · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify Hosted

Company

Headquarters
North Vancouver

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on peterdobias.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25