Website review, no card needed
pkz.ch website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202642 issues · 86 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on pkz.ch, 18 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: other Google APIs/SDKs adds 4.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 4.6 s
4.6 sOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 4.6 s of main-thread work and 4.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
2.1 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 21
21/100Your mobile performance score is 21. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.4 s
A phone's processor spends 7.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Other Google APIs/SDKs, Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 4.9 MB and 5.0 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
850 ms · 1.5 MB38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
860 ms · 865 KiBAbout 865 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 860 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
750 ms · 386 KiB9 images could be 386 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 890 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 267 ms
267 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 267 ms of main-thread work and 188 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Adobe TypeKit adds 7 ms
7 msAdobe TypeKit costs a phone 7 ms of main-thread work and 543 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 34.0 s
34.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.3 s
8.3 sYour largest element takes 8.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 9.5 s
9.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.51
0.51The layout shifts by 0.51 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 961 ms
961 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 961 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s
2.5 sThe first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
29 images without width and height
29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 147 ms
147 msReal visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 491 ms
491 msReal visitors wait 491 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 83 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 83 requests on a phone: other files 3.3 MB (17), scripts 1.5 MB (18) and images 803 KiB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images in older formats
5 images (257 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (73 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.70 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.70 g of CO₂e: 204.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
28 images without alt text
28 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (4 elements).
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names (3 elements).
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
232 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 232 pages on pkz.ch and 3 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Shoppen Sie im Online Shop von PKZ bereits heute die Looks von Morgen. Jetzt online Herren- und Damenbekleidung shoppen…”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “PKZ.CH | Fashion Online-Shop | Grosse Auswahl an Top-Marken”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.pkz.ch/de/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.pkz.ch/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (777 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages share 4 titles
https://www.pkz.ch/de, https://www.pkz.ch/de/changelanguage/2 and https://www.pkz.ch/de/changelanguage/3 all use the title “PKZ.CH | Fashion Online-Shop | Grosse Auswahl an Top-Marken”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages share a meta description
https://www.pkz.ch/de/changelanguage/2, https://www.pkz.ch/de/changelanguage/3, https://www.pkz.ch/de/wishlist, https://www.pkz.ch/de/nachhaltigkeit, https://www.pkz.ch/de/new-bekleidung-damen and https://www.pkz.ch/de/new-schuhe-damen and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.pkz.ch/de/changelanguage/2 and https://www.pkz.ch/de/changelanguage/3 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
No mobile viewport
No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.
18 small tap targets
18 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
12 distorted images
12 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 272 words of copy
The homepage carries about 272 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Shop the Magazine”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pkz.ch, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- nopCommerce
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Nine Internet Solutions AG
Company
- Founded
- 1881
- Headquarters
- Urdorf
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on pkz.ch, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.