Website review, no card needed

plan-c.com logo

plan-c.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202633 issues · 82 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on plan-c.com, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.5 sMay 23Nov 71.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Nov 7, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
178 ms100 msMay 23Nov 7135 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026109 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026123 ms
Jun 20, 2026127 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026131 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026140 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026136 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026132 ms
Aug 29, 2026140 ms
Sep 5, 2026139 ms
Sep 12, 2026140 ms
Sep 19, 2026145 ms
Sep 26, 2026165 ms
Oct 3, 2026169 ms
Oct 10, 2026165 ms
Oct 17, 2026149 ms
Oct 24, 2026139 ms
Oct 31, 2026136 ms
Nov 7, 2026135 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of plan-c.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. plan-c.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. plan-c.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. plan-c.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. plan-c.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. plan-c.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. plan-c.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. plan-c.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  8. plan-c.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

5 to fix51
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 184 KiB

    About 184 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 163 KiB

    4 images could be 163 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 234 ms

    234 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 234 ms of main-thread work and 376 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Google Analytics and others), adding 546 KiB and 311 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 50 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (50 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    About 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 553 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.31

    0.31

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.31 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    Your largest element takes 12.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.335

    0.335

    The layout shifts by 0.335 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 109 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Real visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 461 ms

    461 ms

    Real visitors wait 461 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 162 ms

    162 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 162 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 66.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 126 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 126 requests on a phone: scripts 736 KiB (43), other files 620 KiB (64) and images 497 KiB (8). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7187
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (4 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10088
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 107 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 107 pages on plan-c.com and 3 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “Visit Plan C official e-commerce website and discover high-end women’s clothing and accessories: edgy design and the hi…”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Plan C - High-end women's clothing and accessories”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://plan-c.com/en-us.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://plan-c.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://plan-c.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/fw26-first-drop, https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/accessories, https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/jewelry, https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/stivali, https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/mules-e-slingback and https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/sabot-and-clogs have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://plan-c.com/en-us/collections/fw26-first-drop, whose canonical is https://plan-c.com/en-us/en-us/collections/fw26-first-drop. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/da-restock/da-restock.css' from origin 'https://plan-c.…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 100 words

    The homepage has only about 100 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop now” and “Contact”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at plan-c.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Eaze Button · Pre Order · amazonaws.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Milan

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on plan-c.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25