Website review, no card needed
poiray.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202633 issues · 83 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on poiray.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 22.0 MB in 426 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #37,073 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 60%
- #24,698 of 61,859 online storesbeats 54%
- #23,830 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 143 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 90). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 108 KiB5 images could be 108 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
340 ms · 355 KiBAbout 355 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 340 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,239 HTML elements
The page has 2,239 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Tag Manager adds 190 ms
190 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 190 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and 506.io and others), adding 771 KiB and 320 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
39 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
35 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 90 but mobile only 45. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 50 ms
50 msYour server sent the HTML in 50 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.4 s
9.4 sYour largest element takes 9.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.853
0.853The layout shifts by 0.853 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 13.0 s
13.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 4.7 s
4.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s
2.2 sThe first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 141 ms
141 msReal visitors wait 141 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 591 ms
591 msReal visitors wait 591 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 81 ms
81 msScripts block the page for only 81 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.0 MB in 426 requests
22.0 MBYour homepage downloads 22.0 MB in 426 requests on a phone: media 17.7 MB (2), images 2.3 MB (204) and other files 937 KiB (136). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 6.2 g of CO₂ per visit
6.24 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.24 g of CO₂e: 749.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
12 tap targets too small
12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
68 images without alt text
68 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (36 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
17 links without text
17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (14 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (198 characters)
Your meta description is 198 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
227 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 227 pages on poiray.com and 5 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Poiray Paris”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “POIRAY | Official website of the house – Poiray Paris”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://poiray.com/en-int.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://poiray.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (699 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://poiray.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://poiray.com/en-int and https://poiray.com/en/en-int all use the title “POIRAY | Official website of the house – Poiray Paris”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://poiray.com/en-int/pages/contact and https://poiray.com/en-int/pages/configurateur-de-montre have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://poiray.com/en/en-int, whose canonical is https://poiray.com/en-int. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://poiray.com/en-int/pages/configurateur-de-montre and https://poiray.com/en-int/pages/maison have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 91 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0690/2595/6142/products/PTIP_601_Tissu_bleu_jeans_15_mm_e7d520d9-e016-4adf-9ede-21d81c80367c_800x.png?v=1682334722.
43 small tap targets
43 of 136 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 456 words of copy
The homepage carries about 456 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “CONTACT US”, “[email protected]” and “Contact us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at poiray.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on poiray.com, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.