Website review, no card needed

poloar.com.br logo

poloar.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202628 issues · 81 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on poloar.com.br, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
141 ms114 msMay 9Oct 24137 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026119 ms
May 16, 2026120 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026117 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026120 ms
Jun 27, 2026120 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026124 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026127 ms
Aug 1, 2026127 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026131 ms
Aug 22, 2026135 ms
Aug 29, 2026137 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026134 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026132 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms
Oct 17, 2026136 ms
Oct 24, 2026137 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of poloar.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. poloar.com.br at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. poloar.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. poloar.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. poloar.com.br at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. poloar.com.br at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. poloar.com.br at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. poloar.com.br at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. poloar.com.br at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix67
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 268 KiB

    About 268 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 92). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • vtexassets.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 367 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, vtex.com and privacytools.com.br and others), adding 601 KiB and 136 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    2 images could be 28 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (26 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 87 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 92 but mobile only 67. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 398 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Your largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Indicação ao prêmio reclame aqui”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Real visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.10

    0.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 747 ms

    747 ms

    Real visitors wait 747 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.093

    0.093

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.093, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 37 ms

    37 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 37 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    20e90cf0-6529-4782-bb5d-773ab71311d5___04197bc4c0bfaae5ca273 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.36 g of CO₂e: 42.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 78 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 78 requests on a phone: scripts 530 KiB (16), images 394 KiB (14) and other files 225 KiB (41). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8588
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Links must have discernible text (5 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10096
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 14 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 14 pages on poloar.com.br and 0 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “Procurando Ar Condicionado? Na Poloar você encontra a maior variedade de produtos, além do melhor atendimento e condiçõ…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Ar Condicionado é na Poloar”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Ar Condicionado das Melhores Marcas | Poloar”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.poloar.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.poloar.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.poloar.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (447 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.poloar.com.br/calculadora-de-btus has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 7 internal pages checked

    We fetched 7 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 7 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 7 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7383
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Attribution Reporting is deprecated and will be removed. See https://goo.gle/ps-status for details.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://rate.trustvox.com.br/widget.css' from origin 'https://www.poloar.com.br' has been …”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 464 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 464 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at poloar.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2017.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on poloar.com.br, including 8 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25