Website review, no card needed

portwest.com logo

portwest.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202649 issues · 83 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on portwest.com, 19 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s2.5 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.6 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
110 ms92 msMay 9Oct 2496 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 2026101 ms
Jun 6, 2026102 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026103 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026103 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 2026100 ms
Jul 25, 2026100 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026108 ms
Sep 12, 2026106 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 2026101 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 202699 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of portwest.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. portwest.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. portwest.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. portwest.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. portwest.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. portwest.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. portwest.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. portwest.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. portwest.com at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

13 to fix38
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    24.9 s · 5.7 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    20.0 s · 3.8 MB

    10 images could be 3.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 20.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.1 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    990 ms · 151 KiB

    151 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    660 ms · 169 KiB

    About 169 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 660 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 507 ms

    507 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 507 ms of main-thread work and 977 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    500 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 401 ms

    401 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 401 ms of main-thread work and 550 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    400 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 249 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 40.9 s

    40.9 s

    Your largest element takes 40.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner”.

  • Time to Interactive: 41.0 s

    41.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 41.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 750 ms

    750 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 750 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 933 ms

    933 ms

    Real visitors wait 933 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 7.9 MB in 92 requests

    7.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 92 requests on a phone: images 5.3 MB (23), scripts 2.2 MB (31) and fonts 172 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 3.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (4.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (2.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 268.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8089
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 form fields without a label

    11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7566
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (8 characters)

    Your title is only 8 characters: “PORTWEST”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://portwest.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 364 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 364 pages on portwest.com and 6 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Fastest growing workwear company in the world. Designer, manufacturer and distributor of flame-resistant workwear, high…”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://portwest.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9297
  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix64
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 92 words

    The homepage has only about 92 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Learn more” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at portwest.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
27 open roles
Teams
Field Sales (14), Warehouse (5), IT (2), Commercial (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on portwest.com, including 23 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25