Website review, no card needed

poynting.tech logo

poynting.tech website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202641 issues · 87 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on poynting.tech, 16 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 173.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
380 ms155 msMay 2Oct 17329 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026213 ms
May 9, 2026195 ms
May 16, 2026193 ms
May 23, 2026181 ms
May 30, 2026183 ms
Jun 6, 2026183 ms
Jun 13, 2026183 ms
Jun 20, 2026185 ms
Jun 27, 2026193 ms
Jul 4, 2026210 ms
Jul 11, 2026204 ms
Jul 18, 2026210 ms
Jul 25, 2026205 ms
Aug 1, 2026197 ms
Aug 8, 2026198 ms
Aug 15, 2026201 ms
Aug 22, 2026205 ms
Aug 29, 2026224 ms
Sep 5, 2026298 ms
Sep 12, 2026323 ms
Sep 19, 2026340 ms
Sep 26, 2026354 ms
Oct 3, 2026337 ms
Oct 10, 2026330 ms
Oct 17, 2026329 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of poynting.tech (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. poynting.tech at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. poynting.tech at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. poynting.tech at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. poynting.tech at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. poynting.tech at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. poynting.tech at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. poynting.tech at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. poynting.tech at 5.8 s5.8 s

Speed

14 to fix29
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.1 s · 1.9 MB

    About 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 10.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 29

    29/100

    Your mobile performance score is 29 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, YouTube and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 4.1 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    850 ms · 228 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (228 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 238 KiB

    2 images could be 238 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 200 KiB

    About 200 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 716 ms

    716 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 716 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 451 ms

    451 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 451 ms of main-thread work and 317 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 434 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • rocketseed.net adds 323 ms

    323 ms

    rocketseed.net costs a phone 323 ms of main-thread work and 120 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,959 HTML elements

    The page has 1,959 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 57 but mobile only 29. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 33.7 s

    33.7 s

    Your largest element takes 33.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.1 s

    39.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 414 ms

    414 ms

    Real visitors wait 414 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 62% slower for real visitors

    +62%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 213 ms to 329 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 34% slower for real visitors

    +34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.024

    0.024

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.024, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 222 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 222 requests on a phone: scripts 4.2 MB (96), images 999 KiB (24) and fonts 800 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (192 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.09 g of CO₂e: 250.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 28 text elements with low contrast

    28 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 9 images without alt text

    9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 29 form fields without a label

    29 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Featured Products”, “International” and “South Africa”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 120 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 120 pages on poynting.tech and 25 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Home - POYNTING Antenna Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://poynting.tech/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://poynting.tech/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://poynting.tech/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,227 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://poynting.tech/our-story and https://poynting.tech/our-company all use the title “Our Story - POYNTING Antenna Solutions”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://poynting.tech/our-distributors-partners, https://poynting.tech/our-story, https://poynting.tech/our-company, https://poynting.tech/careers, https://poynting.tech/poynting-strategic-alliances and https://poynting.tech/antennas and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://poynting.tech/our-company, whose canonical is https://poynting.tech/our-story. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7397
  • 6 third-party cookies

    6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    37 of 44 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,791 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,791 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Subscribe to Newsletter” and “Register Today”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 36 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at poynting.tech, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on poynting.tech, including 27 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25