Website review, no card needed

ppnorcal.org logo

ppnorcal.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202640 issues · 83 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on ppnorcal.org, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s3.1 sMay 9Oct 243.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
278 ms189 msMay 9Oct 24203 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026223 ms
May 16, 2026225 ms
May 23, 2026228 ms
May 30, 2026229 ms
Jun 6, 2026239 ms
Jun 13, 2026248 ms
Jun 20, 2026258 ms
Jun 27, 2026268 ms
Jul 4, 2026265 ms
Jul 11, 2026254 ms
Jul 18, 2026242 ms
Jul 25, 2026230 ms
Aug 1, 2026224 ms
Aug 8, 2026222 ms
Aug 15, 2026219 ms
Aug 22, 2026214 ms
Aug 29, 2026210 ms
Sep 5, 2026205 ms
Sep 12, 2026202 ms
Sep 19, 2026201 ms
Sep 26, 2026199 ms
Oct 3, 2026201 ms
Oct 10, 2026202 ms
Oct 17, 2026203 ms
Oct 24, 2026203 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ppnorcal.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ppnorcal.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ppnorcal.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ppnorcal.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ppnorcal.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ppnorcal.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ppnorcal.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ppnorcal.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ppnorcal.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix40
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.4 s · 1.3 MB

    42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40 (desktop: 73). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 473 KiB

    About 473 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 96 KiB

    About 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 327 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Facebook and AB Tasty and others), adding 276 KiB and 162 ms of main-thread time.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 73 but mobile only 40. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 58 ms

    58 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 58 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Your largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.388

    0.388

    The layout shifts by 0.388 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 660 ms

    660 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 660 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 202 ms

    202 ms

    Real visitors wait 202 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 223 ms to 203 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix98
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    dr_and_patient_istock.jpg__500x375_q80_subsampling-2.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (25 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 64.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 68 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 68 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (39), other files 248 KiB (13) and fonts 198 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8889
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (4 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 5 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8588
  • Meta description is long (206 characters)

    Your meta description is 206 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 53 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 53 pages on ppnorcal.org and 14 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Planned Parenthood Northern California”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Planned Parenthood Northern California”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.plannedparenthood.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.plannedparenthood.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (941 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california and https://www.plannedparenthood.org/es/planned-parenthood-northern-california-es all use the title “Planned Parenthood Northern California”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.plannedparenthood.org/es/planned-parenthood-northern-california-es, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-care/our-health-centers, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-care/pricing-insurance, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/community-health/community-health-workers-promotores, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/community-health/education-services and https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-involved-locally/donate-locally and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-care/our-health-centers, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/community-health/education-services, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-involved-locally, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-involved-locally/learn and https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-northern-california/get-involved-locally/volunteer have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 8197
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 498 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 498 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK APPOINTMENT ONLINE”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call Planned Parenthood”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ppnorcal.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Employees
416

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on ppnorcal.org, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25