Website review, no card needed
pragmaticcoders.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202633 issues · 87 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on pragmaticcoders.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 257 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 244 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 338 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
24.3 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 24.3 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.3 s · 659 KiBAbout 659 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Cookiebot and others), adding 867 KiB and 952 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 610 ms
610 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 610 ms of main-thread work and 531 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 346 KiB13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (346 KiB).
Improve image delivery
393 KiB11 images could be 393 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 276 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 253 ms
253 msFacebook costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 227 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,883 HTML elements
The page has 1,883 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sThe first text or image appears after 8.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 32.1 s
32.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sYour largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Building, Scaling, and Rescuing Software Projects Since 2014”.
Speed Index: 8.7 s
8.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 828 ms
828 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 828 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 257 ms to 338 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
28 images without width and height
28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 444 ms
444 msReal visitors wait 444 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.9 MB in 348 requests
7.9 MBYour homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 348 requests on a phone: images 4.7 MB (164), scripts 2.2 MB (128) and media 419 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 267.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 72 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 3 problems
Structured data found (Corporation, ImageObject, ItemList and SiteNavigationElement) but with 3 problems, for example “Corporation: review is an empty list”.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
238 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 238 pages on pragmaticcoders.com and 15 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Pragmatic Coders is a Polish software development company. We've been building bespoke Digital Health and FinTech solut…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Building, Scaling, and RescuingSoftware Projects Since 2014”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Bespoke Software Development Company | Pragmatic Coders”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.pragmaticcoders.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.pragmaticcoders.pl/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,298 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.pragmaticcoders.com/llms.txt (83 KiB, 232 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.pragmaticcoders.com/industries/fintech/banking-software-development and https://www.pragmaticcoders.com/industries/fintech/custom-financial-software-development-services use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 125 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,546 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,546 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Join Us!”, “How to start a startup” and “Contact us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 38 testimonial or review blocks, 21 customer or partner logos, 6 trust badges and “63k users”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
23 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pragmaticcoders.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on pragmaticcoders.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.