Website review, no card needed

precisionresourcegroup.co.uk logo

precisionresourcegroup.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202632 issues · 76 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on precisionresourcegroup.co.uk, 13 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.3 sMay 30Sep 51.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
94 ms88 msJun 20Jul 1193 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 20, 202693 ms
Jun 27, 202689 ms
Jul 4, 202693 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of precisionresourcegroup.co.uk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. precisionresourcegroup.co.uk at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

7 to fix77
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.1 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.8 MB

    8 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 77

    77/100

    Your mobile performance score is 77 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 158 KiB

    About 158 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    750 ms · 102 KiB

    102 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    386 KiB

    About 386 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 287 ms

    287 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 287 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and herefish.com and others), adding 983 KiB and 336 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 146 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    96 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (96 KiB).

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix84
  • Time to Interactive: 21.5 s

    21.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Your largest element takes 3.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A Global Leader in Recruitment and Talent Solutions”.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 141 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 10.5 MB in 58 requests

    10.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.5 MB in 58 requests on a phone: media 5.4 MB (2), images 3.6 MB (16) and scripts 952 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    3.1 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Shivani-Patel-1.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 50 px. Resized copies would save about 3.1 MB.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Shivani-Patel-1.png weighs 2.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (3.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (3.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.99 g of CO₂e: 358.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8088
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “Home - PRG”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 34 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on precisionresourcegroup.co.uk and 4 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Unlock your business' potential with Precision Resource Group. From sourcing to onboarding, we provide top-tier talent …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “A Global Leader in Recruitment and Talent Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (461 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/job/lead-senior-recruitment-consultant-public-sector, https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/job/recruitment-consultant-bbbh120_1713457387, https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/job/trainee-recruitment-consultant-entry-level-bbbh124_1733995158 and https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/about/client-solutions have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/about and https://precisionresourcegroup.co.uk/our_brands use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 544 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 544 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Join Our Team” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at precisionresourcegroup.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on precisionresourcegroup.co.uk, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25