Website review, no card needed

preferredcompliance.com logo

preferredcompliance.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202649 issues · 98 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on preferredcompliance.com, 17 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s3.0 sMay 2Oct 173.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
120 ms74 msMay 2Oct 1781 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202685 ms
May 9, 202688 ms
May 16, 202694 ms
May 23, 2026109 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026110 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 202680 ms
Jun 27, 202681 ms
Jul 4, 202681 ms
Jul 11, 202679 ms
Jul 18, 202684 ms
Jul 25, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202683 ms
Aug 8, 202690 ms
Aug 15, 202686 ms
Aug 22, 202683 ms
Aug 29, 202686 ms
Sep 5, 202682 ms
Sep 12, 202683 ms
Sep 19, 202683 ms
Sep 26, 202680 ms
Oct 3, 202693 ms
Oct 10, 202681 ms
Oct 17, 202681 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of preferredcompliance.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. preferredcompliance.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. preferredcompliance.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. preferredcompliance.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. preferredcompliance.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. preferredcompliance.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. preferredcompliance.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. preferredcompliance.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. preferredcompliance.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

14 to fix39
  • Improve image delivery

    6.5 s · 2.5 MB

    17 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.8 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 1.9 MB

    About 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 584 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (584 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, YouTube and Hubspot and others), adding 8.8 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 289 ms

    289 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 289 ms of main-thread work and 5.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 562 ms

    562 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 562 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 197 KiB

    About 197 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 396 ms

    396 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 396 ms of main-thread work and 978 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hubspot adds 362 ms

    362 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 362 ms of main-thread work and 535 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,974 HTML elements

    The page has 1,974 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 118 ms

    118 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 118 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 248 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 31.7 s

    31.7 s

    Your largest element takes 31.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Because You Deserve The Best Compliance Program Talk to a c…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.7 s

    40.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.4 s

    14.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 647 ms

    647 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 647 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 85 ms to 81 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 484 ms

    484 ms

    Real visitors wait 484 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix36
  • Page weight: 10.9 MB in 175 requests

    10.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.9 MB in 175 requests on a phone: images 5.1 MB (52), scripts 3.8 MB (40) and fonts 844 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    6aba451a37817c4f58def225_preloader.gif weighs 852 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (1.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    6aba451a37817c4f58def276_MicrosoftTeams-image%20(4)-p-500.pn is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.10 g of CO₂e: 372.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8990
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 36 form fields without a label

    36 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 140 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8574
  • Title is long (118 characters)

    Your title is 118 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Housing Compliance Consulting and Services | LIHTC Compliance Monitoring | HUD Compliance…”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 10 H1 headlines

    There are 10 <h1> headlines (“We Are expertsBuilding amazingWebsites”, “Because You Deserve The Best Compliance Program” and “We Are expertsBuilding amazingWebsites”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 25 links with vague text

    25 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Meta description is long (217 characters)

    Your meta description is 217 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 243 internal links, 35 external

    The homepage links to 243 pages on preferredcompliance.com and 35 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.preferredcompliance.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.preferredcompliance.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.preferredcompliance.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,941 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix85
  • 11 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.preferredcompliance.com/services/housing-compliance-monitoring-services, https://www.preferredcompliance.com/services/housing-compliance-reporting-services, https://www.preferredcompliance.com/services/compliance-with-hud-and-rd, https://www.preferredcompliance.com/services/housing-compliance-file-reviews, https://www.preferredcompliance.com/services/affordable-housing-site-inspections and https://www.preferredcompliance.com/services/housing-compliance-state-audit and 5 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.preferredcompliance.com/resources/hotma and https://www.preferredcompliance.com/about-us/celebrating-25-years have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6974
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5e2f1f4cfab0936b0fc72fcf/5e2f1f4cfab0936587c73030_angle.svg.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'tagName')”.

  • 6 distorted images

    6 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    31 of 34 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 642 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 642 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Talk to a compliance professional” and “Click To Learn More!”.

  • 28 calls to action

    The homepage has 28 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Talk to a compliance professional” and “Click To Learn More!”.

  • 7 short forms

    7 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 25 testimonial or review blocks, 22 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 7 phone links and 7 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 35 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at preferredcompliance.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on preferredcompliance.com, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25