Website review, no card needed

prelios.com logo

prelios.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202630 issues · 74 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on prelios.com, 11 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
97 ms81 msMay 9Oct 2488 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 202690 ms
May 23, 202690 ms
May 30, 202690 ms
Jun 6, 202688 ms
Jun 13, 202690 ms
Jun 20, 202690 ms
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202690 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202693 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202683 ms
Aug 22, 202683 ms
Aug 29, 202688 ms
Sep 5, 202691 ms
Sep 12, 202690 ms
Sep 19, 202691 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202688 ms
Oct 17, 202690 ms
Oct 24, 202688 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of prelios.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. prelios.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. prelios.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. prelios.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. prelios.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. prelios.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. prelios.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. prelios.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. prelios.com at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

7 to fix68
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 194 KiB

    About 194 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 92). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    550 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    480 ms · 69 KiB

    69 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    480 ms · 51 KiB

    About 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 51 KiB

    15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (51 KiB).

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 117 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Monotype), adding 1 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 258 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Your largest element takes 4.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.8 s).

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 81 ms

    81 ms

    Real visitors wait 81 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 694 ms

    694 ms

    Real visitors wait 694 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 50 ms

    50 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 50 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.15 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.15 g of CO₂e: 17.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 536 KiB in 17 requests

    536 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 536 KiB in 17 requests on a phone: scripts 340 KiB (6), images 99 KiB (3) and stylesheets 75 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9696
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9269
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Prelios Corporate Website |”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 210 internal links, 32 external

    The homepage links to 210 pages on prelios.com and 32 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://prelios.com/it.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://prelios.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://prelios.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (752 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 6 pages share 3 titles

    https://prelios.com/it/gruppo and https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/breve all use the title “In breve | Prelios Corporate Website”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://prelios.com/it/gruppo, https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/breve, https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/business, https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/certificazioni-e-attestazioni, https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/certificazioni-e-attestazioni/politica-qualita-e-hsee and https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/ratings and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://prelios.com/it/gruppo, whose canonical is https://prelios.com/it/gruppo/breve. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://prelios.com/it/societa-operative and https://prelios.com/it/societa-operative/prelios-credit-servicing have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 114 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 51 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 430 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 430 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at prelios.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Asn Enter

Company

Founded
1990
Headquarters
Milan

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on prelios.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25