presentationstudio.com website review

About 867 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.

11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

14 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Squarespace, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and others), adding 5.1 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

Squarespace costs a phone 634 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

About 128 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

Polyfills for old browsers add 118 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 380 ms of main-thread work and 526 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

squarespace-cdn.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 206 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12 KiB).

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Your largest element takes 19.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The page becomes fully interactive after 19.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 360 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 141 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (28), scripts 2.0 MB (80) and fonts 179 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

4 images further down the page (154 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.48 g of CO₂e: 177.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Links must have discernible text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

Your title is only 19 characters: “Presentation Studio”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Australia's Leading PowerPoint Presentation Desig…”, “Recent Client Work” and “Recent Client Work Recent Client Work”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

Your meta description is 227 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

Structured data found (LocalBusiness and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: image is not an absolute URL ("//images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/651a8a865bb8d47b117…”.

The homepage links to 48 pages on presentationstudio.com and 11 external pages.

Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

/work-with-us, /services, /about, /case-studies, /contact and /case-studies/netball-nsw and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

/case-studies, /case-studies/wildlife, /case-studies/netball-nsw, /case-studies/benmax-awards, /case-studies/scotlands-charity-air-ambulance-scaa and /faqs have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

/contact has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.

1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.presentationstudio.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection (404).

http://presentationstudio.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

presentationstudio.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

presentationstudio.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 462 words of visible text.

presentationstudio.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

presentationstudio.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.