Website review, no card needed

primaveras.com.br logo

primaveras.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202643 issues · 88 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on primaveras.com.br, 16 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.0 sApr 25Oct 103.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.6 s
May 2, 20263.7 s
May 9, 20263.7 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
129 ms118 msApr 25Oct 10128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026125 ms
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026124 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026122 ms
Jun 13, 2026126 ms
Jun 20, 2026123 ms
Jun 27, 2026125 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026124 ms
Aug 1, 2026125 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026121 ms
Aug 22, 2026119 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026122 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026127 ms
Oct 10, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of primaveras.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. primaveras.com.br at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. primaveras.com.br at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. primaveras.com.br at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. primaveras.com.br at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. primaveras.com.br at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. primaveras.com.br at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. primaveras.com.br at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. primaveras.com.br at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

10 to fix52
  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 10.3 MB

    20 images could be 10.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.8 s

    48 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 5.6 MB

    146 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.6 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 62). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and RD Station and others), adding 847 KiB and 693 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 106 KiB

    About 106 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 403 ms

    403 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 403 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    366 KiB

    About 366 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 275 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 55 ms

    55 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 55 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 378 ms

    378 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 378 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Real visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.027

    0.027

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.027, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 19.5 MB in 171 requests

    19.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.5 MB in 171 requests on a phone: images 13.8 MB (62), media 3.9 MB (1) and scripts 1.0 MB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    home-50anos-768x267.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (278 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.53 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.53 g of CO₂e: 664.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7989
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 36 text elements with low contrast

    36 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 25 tap targets too small

    25 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (22 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 32 links without text

    32 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 76 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9276
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “Primaveras”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 79 internal links, 33 external

    The homepage links to 79 pages on primaveras.com.br and 33 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Elogios de nossos clientes”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.primaveras.com.br/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.primaveras.com.br/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.primaveras.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,111 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.primaveras.com.br/onde, https://www.primaveras.com.br/fale-conosco, https://www.primaveras.com.br/perdi-alguem, https://www.primaveras.com.br/apoio-ao-luto, https://www.primaveras.com.br/grupo-de-apoio and https://www.primaveras.com.br/estrutura and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.primaveras.com.br/onde, https://www.primaveras.com.br/fale-conosco, https://www.primaveras.com.br/estrutura and https://www.primaveras.com.br/funeraria-primaveras have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.primaveras.com.br/perdi-alguem, https://www.primaveras.com.br/velorio, https://www.primaveras.com.br/repatriacao and https://www.primaveras.com.br/floricultura-primaveras took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    58 of 62 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 162 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,096 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,096 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 10 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at primaveras.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on primaveras.com.br, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25