Website review, no card needed

prime100.com logo

prime100.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202641 issues · 82 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on prime100.com, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.1 sMay 16Aug 222.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
153 ms142 msMay 16Jun 13151 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026143 ms
May 23, 2026143 ms
May 30, 2026150 ms
Jun 6, 2026152 ms
Jun 13, 2026151 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of prime100.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. prime100.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. prime100.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. prime100.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. prime100.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. prime100.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. prime100.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. prime100.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. prime100.com at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

11 to fix56
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.8 s · 538 KiB

    About 538 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    2.7 s

    The page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 2.7 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 327 KiB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (327 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, prime100.com.au and Optanon and others), adding 4.2 MB and 918 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 MB

    18 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 92 KiB

    About 92 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • prime100.com.au adds 316 ms

    316 ms

    prime100.com.au costs a phone 316 ms of main-thread work and 3.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 322 ms

    322 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 322 ms of main-thread work and 528 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,212 HTML elements

    The page has 2,212 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Document request latency

    150 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 150 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 908 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    Your largest element takes 21.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 31 images without width and height

    31 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 759 ms

    759 ms

    Real visitors wait 759 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 117 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.057

    0.057

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.057, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 4.8 MB in 226 requests

    4.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 226 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (34), scripts 1.6 MB (74) and other files 723 KiB (86). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images below the first screen load straight away

    15 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    388 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Prime100_15-4_030b_1_1.png at 2,160 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 388 KiB.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.35 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.35 g of CO₂e: 162.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8992
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Prime100 USA LLC”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://prime100.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 13 links with vague text

    13 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Made in the USA we specialise in dog food designed with functional and single protein diets, recommended by leading Vet…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://prime100.com/password.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    25%

    A phone browser shows 1,880 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 468. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8876
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=211075174&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=08f1485e-916d-43df-854a-36946d12e979&bo=1&sid=9f1de070daf311f1bed4b96554af4343&vid=9f1dbd40daf311f1b5a2eb3f9eb392f0&vids=1&msclkid=N&gtm_.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.

  • 8 distorted images

    8 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    60 of 68 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 1,880 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,880 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop” and “Where To Buy”.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 36 cookies set on arrival

    36

    Opening the homepage sets 36 cookies, 8 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 47 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at prime100.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Onetrust Consent Management · Yotpo Product Reviews · trackedlink.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2023.

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on prime100.com, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25