Website review, no card needed
princess.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202636 issues · 84 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on princess.com, 17 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 302 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 301 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 300 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 305 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 310 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 351 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 370 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 370 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 370 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 376 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 380 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 377 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 374 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.3 s
2.0 s
2.7 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.7 s
5.4 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 5.2 MB61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.2 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.1 s · 857 KiBAbout 857 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 279 KiBAbout 279 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6,533 HTML elements
The page has 6,533 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (mPulse, Adobe Tag Manager and osano.com and others), adding 1.1 MB and 650 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
719 KiB5 images could be 719 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 323 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
coveo.com adds 21 ms
21 mscoveo.com costs a phone 21 ms of main-thread work and 449 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 38 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 36 ms
36 msYour server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.28
0.28For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sThe first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 36.7 s
36.7 sYour largest element takes 36.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 39.3 s
39.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 392 ms
392 msReal visitors wait 392 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 304 ms to 374 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 497 ms
497 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 497 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.124
0.124The layout shifts by 0.124 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 715 ms
715 msReal visitors wait 715 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 36.6 MB in 199 requests
36.6 MBYour homepage downloads 36.6 MB in 199 requests on a phone: media 25.3 MB (2), images 8.1 MB (54) and scripts 1.9 MB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images far larger than shown
1.1 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example naples-view2-princess-cruises-1:2x3-Portrait at 1,220 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (2.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
8 images in older formats
8 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 10.4 g of CO₂ per visit
10.38 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.38 g of CO₂e: 1246.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
69 images without alt text
69 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
58 links without text
58 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Princess Cruises: Award-Winning Cruises & Deals - Princess Cruises”.
28 links with vague text
28 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
18 links crawlers can't follow
18 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
396 internal links, 45 external
The homepage links to 396 pages on princess.com and 45 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “Sail with Princess Cruises & experience award-winning service, luxury accommodations, & exclusive cruise deals to Alask…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “PRINCESS CRUISES VACATIONS”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.princess.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.princess.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,314 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.princess.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 13 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.princess.com/cruise-destinations/european-cruises/mediterranean-and-greek-isles, whose canonical is https://www.princess.com/cruise-destinations/mediterranean-cruises. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 148 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 1,268 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,268 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
34 calls to action
The homepage has 34 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Learn More” and “Reserve Collection”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 8 trust badges.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: Osano
A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at princess.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on princess.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.