Website review, no card needed

pro-bit.si logo

pro-bit.si website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202639 issues · 83 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on pro-bit.si, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: font display. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s1.8 sMay 30Oct 172.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
113 ms84 msJun 6Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202690 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pro-bit.si (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pro-bit.si at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. pro-bit.si at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. pro-bit.si at 4.3 s4.3 s
  4. pro-bit.si at 5.8 s5.8 s
  5. pro-bit.si at 7.2 s7.2 s
  6. pro-bit.si at 8.7 s8.7 s
  7. pro-bit.si at 10.1 s10.1 s
  8. pro-bit.si at 11.6 s11.6 s

Speed

9 to fix60
  • Font display

    1.6 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 37). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 113 KiB

    About 113 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    431 KiB

    About 431 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 790 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 297 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,067 HTML elements

    The page has 2,067 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google CDN adds 113 ms

    113 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 113 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 593 KiB and 202 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 388 ms

    388 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 388 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 18.6 s

    18.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.557

    0.557

    The layout shifts by 0.557 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.8 s

    10.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PRO.4 ME je napredna programska oprema (ERP), posebej zasno…”. Most of its time is element render delay (6.1 s).

  • 22 images without width and height

    22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 70 ms

    70 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 70 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 2 images far larger than shown

    73 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner-naslovna-stran-2000px.webp at 2,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 73 KiB.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.48 g of CO₂e: 57.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.7 MB in 41 requests

    1.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 41 requests on a phone: scripts 816 KiB (19), images 436 KiB (7) and fonts 243 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8690
  • Form elements must have labels (5 elements)

    Form elements must have labels: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 83 text elements with low contrast

    83 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (2 elements)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 139 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 139 pages on pro-bit.si and 5 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “ERP sistem zagotavlja optimalen nadzor nad poslovanjem. Informacijski sistemi in programska oprema izboljšajo produktiv…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Poslovno informacijski ERP sistem za uspešno poslovanje”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pro-bit.si/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pro-bit.si/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,616 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://pro-bit.si/pro-4-me, https://pro-bit.si/pro-4-erp, https://pro-bit.si/resitve-za-socialnovarstvene-ustanove, https://pro-bit.si/digitalne-resitve-za-upravljavce-nepremicnin, https://pro-bit.si/resitve-po-meri and https://pro-bit.si/moduli and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 12 pages slow to respond

    https://pro-bit.si/digitalne-resitve-za-upravljavce-nepremicnin, https://pro-bit.si/resitve-po-meri, https://pro-bit.si/moduli, https://pro-bit.si/moduli/upravljanje-s-cloveskimi-viri, https://pro-bit.si/moduli/upravljanje-financ and https://pro-bit.si/moduli/proizvodnja and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected end of input”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,110 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,110 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pro-bit.si, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2021.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on pro-bit.si, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25