Website review, no card needed

probablysmut.com logo

probablysmut.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202629 issues · 75 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on probablysmut.com, 8 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s939 msMay 16Oct 311.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.1 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.0 s
Oct 3, 2026972 ms
Oct 10, 2026970 ms
Oct 17, 2026984 ms
Oct 24, 20261.0 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms84 msMay 16Oct 31104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202688 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202689 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 202699 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 2026101 ms
Oct 24, 2026100 ms
Oct 31, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of probablysmut.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. probablysmut.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. probablysmut.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. probablysmut.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. probablysmut.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. probablysmut.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  6. probablysmut.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  7. probablysmut.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. probablysmut.com at 7.8 s7.8 s

Speed

11 to fix59
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 306 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (306 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, loox.io and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 466 KiB

    About 466 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Shopify adds 313 ms

    313 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 313 ms of main-thread work and 806 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • loox.io adds 278 ms

    278 ms

    loox.io costs a phone 278 ms of main-thread work and 619 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    294 KiB

    22 images could be 294 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 2,334 HTML elements

    The page has 2,334 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Klaviyo adds 187 ms

    187 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 187 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 156 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Your largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.184

    0.184

    The layout shifts by 0.184 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 88 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Real visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 292 ms

    292 ms

    Real visitors wait 292 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 127 ms

    127 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 127 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 4.2 MB in 423 requests

    4.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 423 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (139), images 1.3 MB (61) and other files 1,005 KiB (172). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Winter_Box_26_Banner.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.18 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9797
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10083
  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “probably smut”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is short (34 characters)

    Your meta description is only 34 characters: “romance book merch for smut lovers”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 227 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 227 pages on probablysmut.com and 10 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://probablysmut.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, Product and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://probablysmut.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://probablysmut.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,022 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://probablysmut.com/collections/fall-2026, https://probablysmut.com/collections/best-sellers, https://probablysmut.com/collections/hockey-drop, https://probablysmut.com/collections/summer-graphic-tees, https://probablysmut.com/collections/mix-match and https://probablysmut.com/collections/hats-2025 and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://probablysmut.com/collections/fall-2026, https://probablysmut.com/collections/best-sellers, https://probablysmut.com/collections/hockey-drop, https://probablysmut.com/collections/summer-graphic-tees, https://probablysmut.com/collections/mix-match and https://probablysmut.com/collections/hats-2025 and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE.NotSameOrigin”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    21 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 377 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 377 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “I look better bent over a book t-shirt”.

  • 51 calls to action

    The homepage has 51 calls to action, for example “book club”, “join for free” and “join the waitlist”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 441 testimonial or review blocks, 40 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 1 trust badge.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Pinterest Tag and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 22 cookies set on arrival

    22

    Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 38 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at probablysmut.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 14 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Powerful Form Builder · Glood Product Recommendations · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Dr Stacked Discounts · Hulk Form Builder · Cartbot · Sami Product Labels · Recommendation Kit · Avada Order Limit · Easify Box Builder · Xo Gallery · loox.io · printful.com · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on probablysmut.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25