Website review, no card needed

promealfood.com logo

promealfood.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202633 issues · 80 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on promealfood.com, 11 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s872 msMay 16Oct 311.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026992 ms
May 23, 2026984 ms
May 30, 2026956 ms
Jun 6, 2026986 ms
Jun 13, 2026981 ms
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.0 s
Aug 29, 20261.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.0 s
Sep 19, 2026995 ms
Sep 26, 2026970 ms
Oct 3, 2026938 ms
Oct 10, 2026916 ms
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.0 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms100 msMay 16Oct 31130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026104 ms
May 23, 2026106 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026119 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026114 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026119 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026124 ms
Aug 22, 2026121 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026128 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Sep 26, 2026125 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026123 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms
Oct 31, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of promealfood.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. promealfood.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. promealfood.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. promealfood.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. promealfood.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. promealfood.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. promealfood.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. promealfood.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. promealfood.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    850 ms · 852 KiB

    10 images could be 852 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,615 HTML elements

    The page has 1,615 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • azurefd.net adds 59 ms

    59 ms

    azurefd.net costs a phone 59 ms of main-thread work and 330 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, weglot.com and Shopify and others), adding 814 KiB and 486 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    196 KiB

    About 196 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    119 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (119 KiB).

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 95 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Your largest element takes 8.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 389 ms

    389 ms

    Real visitors wait 389 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.9 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.019

    0.019

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.019, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 37 ms

    37 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 37 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 394 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 394 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (35), other files 1.3 MB (249) and scripts 792 KiB (81). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    354 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example pm-figma-fresh-video-poster.png at 2,989 px wide, shown at 472 px. Resized copies would save about 354 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (97 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 148.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9190
  • 14 text elements with low contrast

    14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (3 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (3 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7778
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “PROMEAL”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 54 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 54 pages on promealfood.com and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “ארוחות מוכנות ובריאותלשבוע מסודר בלי לבשל”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://promealfood.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://promealfood.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://promealfood.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://promealfood.com/pages/quiz-page, https://promealfood.com/pages/cibus, https://promealfood.com/collections/%D7%9B%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%9C%D7%90-%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9C-%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%AA, https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%A1%D7%94, https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%93%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A7%D7%9C and https://promealfood.com/collections/%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 12 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://promealfood.com/collections/%D7%9B%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%9C%D7%90-%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9C-%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%AA, whose canonical is https://promealfood.com/collections/%d7%9b%d7%9c-%d7%94%d7%9e%d7%95%d7%a6%d7%a8%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%9c%d7%90-%d7%9b%d7%95%d7%9c%d7%9c-%d7%9e%d7%90%d7%a8%d7%96-%d7%94%d7%99%d7%9b%d7%a8%d7%95%d7%aa. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%A1%D7%94, https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%93%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A7%D7%9C and https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%A9%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%95%D7%AA%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%91%D7%95%D7%AA have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 12 pages with very little text

    https://promealfood.com/pages/cibus, https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%A1%D7%94, https://promealfood.com/pages/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%96-%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%93%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A7%D7%9C, https://promealfood.com/collections/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%A7%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%9C%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%92, https://promealfood.com/collections/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9C-%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95 and https://promealfood.com/collections/%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%AA and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 56 words

    The homepage has only about 56 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks, 7 customer or partner logos and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at promealfood.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Microsoft Clarity · Weglot Translate Your Store · Wati Whatsapp Chat · Whatsapp Abandoned Cart · Bixgrow Affiliate · Selleasy · Accessez · flashyapp.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on promealfood.com, including 9 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25