promodo.com website review

1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.1 s.

Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, website-files.com and cloudfront.net and others), adding 2.4 MB and 651 ms of main-thread time.

26 images could be 708 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 380 ms of main-thread work and 653 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

website-files.com costs a phone 223 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

About 374 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

The page has 2,966 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 131 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14 KiB).

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

The page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

The layout shifts by 0.286 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

Real visitors wait 877 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

48 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Visually, the page fills in at 3.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 163 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (128), scripts 1,013 KiB (21) and stylesheets 60 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

3 images (115 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

3 images further down the page (106 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.69 g of CO₂e: 82.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 44 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

76 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

The homepage links to 158 pages on promodo.com and 35 external pages.

There is no https://www.promodo.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 1,453 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.