Website review, no card needed
propersnacks.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202630 issues · 79 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on propersnacks.com, 9 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 890 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 860 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 712 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 659 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 637 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 638 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 643 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 684 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 698 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 707 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 707 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 778 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 831 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 767 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 741 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 741 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 745 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 838 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 910 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 853 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 798 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 728 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 692 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 629 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 740 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 92 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 89 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 91 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.4 s · 1.2 MB30 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 70
70/100Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, framer.com and framerstatic.com), adding 2.3 MB and 562 ms of main-thread time.
framerusercontent.com adds 545 ms
545 msframerusercontent.com costs a phone 545 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
16 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 2.0 s
A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 783 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 42 ms
42 msYour server sent the HTML in 42 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.30
0.30For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sYour largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WELCOME TO PROPER SNACKS”.
Time to Interactive: 9.2 s
9.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.0 s
4.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors wait 0.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 92 ms
92 msReal visitors wait 92 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 323 ms
323 msReal visitors wait 323 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors
-22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.081
0.081The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.081, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 36 ms
36 msScripts block the page for only 36 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.3 MB in 70 requests
2.3 MBYour homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 70 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (37), scripts 322 KiB (26) and fonts 63 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (741 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
94 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example RoUpIhdDMF3pYsw33lDrLC5Z4uk.png at 390 px wide, shown at 66 px. Resized copies would save about 94 KiB.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.66 g of CO₂e: 78.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 126 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
29 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 33 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
34 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 34 pages on propersnacks.com and 9 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 137 characters
Your meta description is 137 characters: “Proper Snacks is the official home of PROPER® Popcorn and Eat Real. Discover better-for-you snacks from a proudly B Cor…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “welcome to proper snacks”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Proper Snacks | Official Brand Site | PROPER® Popcorn & Eat Real”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://propersnacks.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://propersnacks.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://propersnacks.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (602 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages point its canonical at the homepage
https://propersnacks.com/about-us, https://propersnacks.com/our-brands, https://propersnacks.com/life-at-ps, https://propersnacks.com/our-impact, https://propersnacks.com/wellbeing and https://propersnacks.com/modern-slavery-statement declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
https://propersnacks.com/our-impact and https://propersnacks.com/wellbeing all use the title “Our Imapct | Proper Snacks”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://propersnacks.com/our-impact and https://propersnacks.com/wellbeing use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page with very little text
https://propersnacks.com/our-brands has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 internal pages checked
We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 6 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 11 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 225 words
The homepage has only about 225 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “learn more” and “join us”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at propersnacks.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Framer
- Hosting
- Framer
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on propersnacks.com, including 10 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.