Website review, no card needed

propersnacks.com logo

propersnacks.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202630 issues · 79 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on propersnacks.com, 9 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
952 ms587 msMay 9Oct 24740 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 2026890 ms
May 16, 2026860 ms
May 23, 2026712 ms
May 30, 2026659 ms
Jun 6, 2026637 ms
Jun 13, 2026638 ms
Jun 20, 2026643 ms
Jun 27, 2026684 ms
Jul 4, 2026698 ms
Jul 11, 2026707 ms
Jul 18, 2026707 ms
Jul 25, 2026778 ms
Aug 1, 2026831 ms
Aug 8, 2026767 ms
Aug 15, 2026741 ms
Aug 22, 2026741 ms
Aug 29, 2026745 ms
Sep 5, 2026838 ms
Sep 12, 2026910 ms
Sep 19, 2026853 ms
Sep 26, 2026798 ms
Oct 3, 2026728 ms
Oct 10, 2026692 ms
Oct 17, 2026629 ms
Oct 24, 2026740 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms83 msMay 9Oct 2491 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202692 ms
May 16, 202689 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202688 ms
Jul 25, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202693 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202692 ms
Sep 5, 202691 ms
Sep 12, 202689 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 202690 ms
Oct 17, 202693 ms
Oct 24, 202691 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of propersnacks.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. propersnacks.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. propersnacks.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. propersnacks.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. propersnacks.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. propersnacks.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. propersnacks.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. propersnacks.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. propersnacks.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

4 to fix70
  • Improve image delivery

    2.4 s · 1.2 MB

    30 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, framer.com and framerstatic.com), adding 2.3 MB and 562 ms of main-thread time.

  • framerusercontent.com adds 545 ms

    545 ms

    framerusercontent.com costs a phone 545 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    65 KiB

    About 65 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    16 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 783 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 42 ms

    42 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 42 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.30

    0.30

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Your largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WELCOME TO PROPER SNACKS”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors wait 0.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 92 ms

    92 ms

    Real visitors wait 92 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 323 ms

    323 ms

    Real visitors wait 323 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.081

    0.081

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.081, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 36 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 70 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 70 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (37), scripts 322 KiB (26) and fonts 63 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (741 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    94 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example RoUpIhdDMF3pYsw33lDrLC5Z4uk.png at 390 px wide, shown at 66 px. Resized copies would save about 94 KiB.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.66 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.66 g of CO₂e: 78.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8091
  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 126 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 29 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 33 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8592
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 34 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on propersnacks.com and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 137 characters

    Your meta description is 137 characters: “Proper Snacks is the official home of PROPER® Popcorn and Eat Real. Discover better-for-you snacks from a proudly B Cor…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “welcome to proper snacks”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Proper Snacks | Official Brand Site | PROPER® Popcorn & Eat Real”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://propersnacks.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://propersnacks.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://propersnacks.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (602 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix81
  • 6 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://propersnacks.com/about-us, https://propersnacks.com/our-brands, https://propersnacks.com/life-at-ps, https://propersnacks.com/our-impact, https://propersnacks.com/wellbeing and https://propersnacks.com/modern-slavery-statement declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://propersnacks.com/our-impact and https://propersnacks.com/wellbeing all use the title “Our Imapct | Proper Snacks”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://propersnacks.com/our-impact and https://propersnacks.com/wellbeing use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://propersnacks.com/our-brands has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 internal pages checked

    We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 6 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 11 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 225 words

    The homepage has only about 225 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “learn more” and “join us”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at propersnacks.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Framer
Hosting
Framer

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on propersnacks.com, including 10 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25