Website review, no card needed

ptsi.co.id logo

ptsi.co.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202644 issues · 68 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on ptsi.co.id, 21 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s3.2 sMay 9Oct 244.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.0 s
Oct 24, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
205 ms159 msMay 9Oct 24180 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026175 ms
May 16, 2026181 ms
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026181 ms
Jun 6, 2026174 ms
Jun 13, 2026168 ms
Jun 20, 2026173 ms
Jun 27, 2026172 ms
Jul 4, 2026170 ms
Jul 11, 2026169 ms
Jul 18, 2026164 ms
Jul 25, 2026174 ms
Aug 1, 2026179 ms
Aug 8, 2026181 ms
Aug 15, 2026195 ms
Aug 22, 2026194 ms
Aug 29, 2026197 ms
Sep 5, 2026198 ms
Sep 12, 2026200 ms
Sep 19, 2026196 ms
Sep 26, 2026187 ms
Oct 3, 2026178 ms
Oct 10, 2026166 ms
Oct 17, 2026177 ms
Oct 24, 2026180 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ptsi.co.id (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ptsi.co.id at 1.7 s1.7 s
  2. ptsi.co.id at 3.4 s3.4 s
  3. ptsi.co.id at 5.1 s5.1 s
  4. ptsi.co.id at 6.8 s6.8 s
  5. ptsi.co.id at 8.5 s8.5 s
  6. ptsi.co.id at 10.2 s10.2 s
  7. ptsi.co.id at 11.9 s11.9 s
  8. ptsi.co.id at 13.6 s13.6 s

Speed

10 to fix36
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 13.8 MB

    104 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13.8 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    1.5 s

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.5 s on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    1.4 s

    The HTML itself could arrive about 1.4 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    5.7 MB

    29 images could be 5.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 145 KiB

    About 145 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 82 KiB

    About 82 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 710 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Your server takes 1.6 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Google Analytics), adding 252 KiB and 151 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 69 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Real visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.81

    0.81

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.81 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 2.21

    2.21

    The layout shifts by 2.21 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Your largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Office & Branch Branch Office Our branch offices are strate…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.0 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 283 ms

    283 ms

    Real visitors wait 283 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 874 ms

    874 ms

    Real visitors wait 874 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 175 ms to 180 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 45 ms

    45 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 45 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 20.6 MB in 121 requests

    20.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.6 MB in 121 requests on a phone: images 19.9 MB (69), scripts 520 KiB (35) and stylesheets 102 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.85 g of CO₂e: 701.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 6888
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 22 text elements with low contrast

    22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

1 checks passed
  • 23 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 27 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7763
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (25 characters)

    Your title is only 25 characters: “Home | Surveyor Indonesia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 25 links with vague text

    25 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected ',' or '}' after property value in JSON at position)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ptsi.co.id/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ptsi.co.id/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 511 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ptsi.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9296
  • 13 distorted images

    13 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 511 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 511 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ptsi.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on ptsi.co.id, including 22 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25