Website review, no card needed

pulsio.eu logo

pulsio.eu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202618 issues · 57 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on pulsio.eu, 5 of them high impact, across 57 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.1 sMay 23Nov 72.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Nov 7, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
232 ms136 msMay 23Nov 7221 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026168 ms
May 30, 2026168 ms
Jun 6, 2026172 ms
Jun 13, 2026177 ms
Jun 20, 2026186 ms
Jun 27, 2026194 ms
Jul 4, 2026196 ms
Jul 11, 2026190 ms
Jul 18, 2026179 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026152 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026151 ms
Aug 22, 2026158 ms
Aug 29, 2026162 ms
Sep 5, 2026165 ms
Sep 12, 2026170 ms
Sep 19, 2026172 ms
Sep 26, 2026174 ms
Oct 3, 2026177 ms
Oct 10, 2026185 ms
Oct 17, 2026195 ms
Oct 24, 2026206 ms
Oct 31, 2026217 ms
Nov 7, 2026221 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

No screenshot is available for this review.

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 222 ms

    222 ms

    Real visitors wait 222 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors

    +30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 221 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 693 ms

    693 ms

    Real visitors wait 693 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB on a phone, 1.3 MB of it images (26%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (156 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fix93
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 581 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 5 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

100
  • 456 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 456 pages on pulsio.eu and 6 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Pulsio sets a new benchmark in muscle recovery with its range of exceptionally high quality recovery devices and massag…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Move easier, recover faster and feel your best.”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “Pulsio EU - Get Stronger, Recover Faster”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pulsio.eu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pulsio.eu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,779 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://pulsio.eu/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://pulsio.eu/collections/all and https://pulsio.eu/products/pulsio-hip-compression-pro have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://pulsio.eu/collections/all, https://pulsio.eu/products/pulsio-compression, https://pulsio.eu/products/pulsio-compression-pro, https://pulsio.eu/products/pulsio-air, https://pulsio.eu/products/pulsio-tens-pod and https://pulsio.eu/products/pulsio-compression-sleeve and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fix93
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    23 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • A 40-field form

    Your longest form asks for 40 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,161 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,161 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All”.

  • 24 calls to action

    The homepage has 24 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop All” and “Contact us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, 3 customer or partner logos, 3 trust badges and “350,000+ customers”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 30 cookies set on arrival

    30

    Opening the homepage sets 30 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pulsio.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Trackify X · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Triplewhale · Selecty · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Langshop · Frontend · Upcart · redretarget.com · metorik.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on pulsio.eu, including 4 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25