Website review, no card needed
purize-filters.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202637 issues · 82 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on purize-filters.com, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 12.4 MB in 297 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #43,247 of 109,151 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #28,701 of 61,807 online storesbeats 47%
- #27,625 of 56,383 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.5 s
3.8 s
5.0 s
6.3 s
7.5 s
8.8 s
10.0 s
Speed
Shopify adds 1.1 s
1.1 sShopify costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 571 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 5.7 s
A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, tt-srv.com and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 118 KiB4 images could be 118 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
353 KiBAbout 353 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
tt-srv.com adds 308 ms
308 mstt-srv.com costs a phone 308 ms of main-thread work and 60 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,892 HTML elements
The page has 2,892 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Klaviyo adds 107 ms
107 msKlaviyo costs a phone 107 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
211 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (211 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 161 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
83 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 83 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 19 ms
19 msYour server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 15.6 s
15.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sYour largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 6.8 s
6.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 219 ms
219 msReal visitors wait 219 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 863 ms
863 msReal visitors wait 863 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 538 ms
538 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 538 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 149 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.024
0.024The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.024, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.4 MB in 297 requests
12.4 MBYour homepage downloads 12.4 MB in 297 requests on a phone: media 9.4 MB (1), scripts 1.2 MB (128) and other files 847 KiB (105). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Mobile_78fe68bf-9e08-4b4a-aafb-39525789f7aa.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
40 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Mobile_78fe68bf-9e08-4b4a-aafb-39525789f7aa.png at 1,500 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 40 KiB.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.51 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.51 g of CO₂e: 421.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
19 links without text
19 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
116 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 116 pages on purize-filters.com and 7 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 117 characters
Your meta description is 117 characters: “PURIZE® Filters ✅ your headshop No. 1 ✅ Made in Germany ✅ raw materials from ecological cultivation ✅ Order here now!”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “PURIZE® Filters - Your Headshop – B2C PURIZE® Filters”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://purize-filters.com/en.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://purize-filters.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://purize-filters.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (947 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://purize-filters.com/en/policies/shipping-policy, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/thc-crew, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/criminel, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/kif-kif and https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/eko420 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 pages without an H1
https://purize-filters.com/en/policies/shipping-policy, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/thc-crew, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/criminel, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/kif-kif, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/eko420 and https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/sale and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
7 pages with very little text
https://purize-filters.com/en/policies/shipping-policy, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/thc-crew, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/criminel, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/kif-kif, https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/eko420 and https://purize-filters.com/en/collections/sale and 1 other have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 70 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 25 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
About 471 words of copy
The homepage carries about 471 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “contact form” and “Contact”.
15 short forms
15 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at purize-filters.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Powerful Form Builder · Uppromote Affiliate · Judge Me Reviews · Adcell Tracking Remarketing · Anowave Google Tag Manager Ga4 · Langify · Gsc Instagram Feed · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Affliate By Secomapp · Accessibly App · cloudfront.net
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Hiring
- Hiring
- 3 open roles
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on purize-filters.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.