Website review, no card needed
pycca.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202653 issues · 91 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on pycca.com, 23 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 171 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 176 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.2 s · 6.7 MB90 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.4 s · 1.0 MBAbout 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 2.8 MB202 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.8 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s39 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,732 HTML elements
The page has 5,732 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (jelou.ai, Google Tag Manager and TikTok and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
jelou.ai adds 649 ms
649 msjelou.ai costs a phone 649 ms of main-thread work and 812 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 378 ms
378 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 378 ms of main-thread work and 690 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 304 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify CSS
160 ms · 5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Reduce unused CSS
10 ms · 65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
20 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.7 s
27.7 sYour largest element takes 27.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 31.3 s
31.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.9 s
13.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 254 ms
254 msReal visitors wait 254 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 428 ms
428 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 428 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
35 images without width and height
35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 171 ms to 176 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.097
0.097The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.097, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.9 MB in 349 requests
11.9 MBYour homepage downloads 11.9 MB in 349 requests on a phone: images 9.2 MB (142), scripts 2.2 MB (71) and fonts 279 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
36 images far larger than shown
2.3 MB36 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example W03149.png at 600 px wide, shown at 114 px. Resized copies would save about 2.3 MB.
40 images in older formats
40 images (3.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
33 images below the first screen load straight away
33 images further down the page (3.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit
3.37 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.37 g of CO₂e: 404.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (10 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (6 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
46 images without alt text
46 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
28 form fields without a label
28 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
24 links without text
24 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (24 characters)
Your title is only 24 characters: “Pycca | Disfruta la vida”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (181 characters)
Your meta description is 181 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
236 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 236 pages on pycca.com and 20 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.pycca.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.pycca.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,619 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/calzado/adidas has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages share a meta description
/tiendas, /Contactanos, /navidad2026, /OfertasClubPycca, /bazzuka and /1368 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /Contactanos, whose canonical is /contactanos. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
8 pages without an H1
/navidad2026, /OfertasClubPycca, /865, /bazzuka, /1368 and /muebles/terraza-y-exteriores/sillas-y-bancos and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
7 pages slow to respond
/bazzuka, /1368, /muebles/terraza-y-exteriores/sillas-y-bancos, /calzado/adidas, /casio and /muebles-sillas-de-comedor-n00148/p and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Event name is not defined”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
178 of 185 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,056 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,056 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Taboola and TikTok Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pycca.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Telconet S.A
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on pycca.com, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.