Website review, no card needed

qm.org.qa logo

qm.org.qa website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202631 issues · 77 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on qm.org.qa, 11 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.6 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
251 ms170 msMay 9Oct 24179 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026201 ms
May 16, 2026206 ms
May 23, 2026209 ms
May 30, 2026215 ms
Jun 6, 2026213 ms
Jun 13, 2026211 ms
Jun 20, 2026217 ms
Jun 27, 2026216 ms
Jul 4, 2026224 ms
Jul 11, 2026229 ms
Jul 18, 2026226 ms
Jul 25, 2026233 ms
Aug 1, 2026236 ms
Aug 8, 2026238 ms
Aug 15, 2026242 ms
Aug 22, 2026235 ms
Aug 29, 2026229 ms
Sep 5, 2026220 ms
Sep 12, 2026212 ms
Sep 19, 2026198 ms
Sep 26, 2026193 ms
Oct 3, 2026187 ms
Oct 10, 2026179 ms
Oct 17, 2026180 ms
Oct 24, 2026179 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qm.org.qa (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qm.org.qa at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. qm.org.qa at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. qm.org.qa at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. qm.org.qa at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. qm.org.qa at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. qm.org.qa at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. qm.org.qa at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. qm.org.qa at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

7 to fix66
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 1.8 MB

    15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 MB

    6 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 261 KiB

    About 261 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 323 ms

    323 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 323 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,530 HTML elements

    The page has 1,530 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and New Relic and others), adding 469 KiB and 478 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 192 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    97 KiB

    About 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    37 KiB

    37 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 661 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 52 ms

    52 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 52 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 10.8 s

    10.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WELCOME TO QATAR MUSEUMS”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.6 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 165 ms

    165 ms

    Real visitors wait 165 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 201 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 196 ms

    196 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 196 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 29 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 29 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (6), scripts 635 KiB (7) and fonts 212 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    42 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example exterior-entrance-mathaf-arab-muse.891ff7a7.fill-800x400.jpg at 800 px wide, shown at 144 px. Resized copies would save about 42 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (293 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.65 g of CO₂e: 77.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9597
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 46 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 9271
  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “Qatar Museums - Qatar Museums”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Welcome to Qatar Museums”, “Explore Qatar Museums through personalised AI-gui…” and “What's On”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://qm.org.qa/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at qm.org.qa/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 89 internal links, 30 external

    The homepage links to 89 pages on qm.org.qa and 30 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Welcome to Qatar Museums – Bringing to life art, culture & heritage in Qatar. Visit our museums, galleries & historic s…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://qm.org.qa/en/.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://qm.org.qa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,344 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 1 page with very little text

    https://qm.org.qa/ar has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://qm.org.qa/en/stories, https://qm.org.qa/en/visit, https://qm.org.qa/en/stories/all-stories/bued-nadhar-curator-interview, https://qm.org.qa/en/stories/all-stories/al-zubarah-interactive and https://qm.org.qa/en/calendar/beyti-beytak-2026 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    55 of 58 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,351 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,351 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Contact Us” and “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qm.org.qa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Sucuri

Company

Founded
2005

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on qm.org.qa, including 15 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25